Search results

(nb - this was only deleted by PROD so could be restored easily, see WP:DRV)

...fin; ∇ ℘ ℑ ℜ}} ∂ ∫ ∑ ∏ √ ∞ ∇ ℘ ℑ ℜ

&prod;_''i'' ''A''_''i'' &prod;_''i'' ''X''_''i''<br>

...the continued conjunction or continued product operation <math>\textstyle\prod</math> for the upper index <math>r.</math> Taking the upper default value | <math>\Upsilon_p (q) = \Upsilon (p, q) = \Upsilon (p, q, \textstyle\prod).</math>

&prod;_''i'' ''A''_''i'' &prod;_''i'' ''X''_''i''<br>

...the continued conjunction or continued product operation <math>\textstyle\prod\!</math> for the upper index <math>r.\!</math> Taking the upper default va | <math>\Upsilon_p (q) = \Upsilon (p, q) = \Upsilon (p, q, \textstyle\prod).\!</math>

...start date of 8 October 2007). The vandal has repeated the abuse of the {{prod}} tag despite being warned on his/her talk page (see above). The vandal has

Contested prod. My prodding reason was: ''Non-notable restaurant with minor press coverage *'''Keep''' I'm the one that contested the prod, saying that we should give it a bit more than a few hours before pushing f

...rod and converted it to an AfD, with the exact same reason as the original prod and no contesting done by anyone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ar [20:40] <elapse> prod was contested by an SPA

...the continued conjunction or continued product operation <math>\textstyle\prod\!</math> for the upper index <math>r.\!</math> Taking the upper default va | <math>\Upsilon_p (q) = \Upsilon (p, q) = \Upsilon (p, q, \textstyle\prod).\!</math>

[01:42:41] <RD> It was just a PROD. Request undeletion or don't. ...<JamesEG> i'm curious as to why there is a separate procedure for AfD and PROD?

[15:00] <tommorris> or PROD it [15:01] <dkonstantinos> PROD?

May 08 01:05:48 <Randomguy93> AfD/PROD... ?

�06[18:49] * funnyfarm299 wonders if this is a case for prod or AfD? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killbillies_%282012_Film%29 [18:54] <Gfoley4> funnyfarm299: you can AFD or PROD anything as long as people agree with it

[21:29] <Thehelpfulone> there was a prod on it? [21:29] <Thehelpfulone> Aranda56: I know, but I mean I didn't see the prod

[17:12] <Pesky> Evil tingles, pins and needles, cattle-prod electric shocks, all down arm, shoulders, part of hand, bits of back

�08[12:15] <derp> Cattle prod the oyster ditch [12:16] <quanticle> Cattle prod the what with the where now?

&prod;_''i'' ''A''_''i'' &prod;_''i'' ''X''_''i''<br>

Jul 08 15:15:55 <TeeTylerToe> prod can't be used for deletions and it would take 7 days anyway Jul 08 20:27:18 <a930913> Swob: Prod?

[16:12] <Steven_Zhang> I can has clean Prod log? [16:12] <PeterSymonds> Prod log?

�06[16:36] * LauraHale prod prods courcelles �06[16:38] * Dragonfly6-7 passes LauraHale a cattle prod

[22:05] <funnyfarm299> Because if they fail CSD, I prod them. [22:21] <funnyfarm299> Should I prod this for WP:NOT#DICT? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphocentrism

[17:14] <slon02> PROD instead? [17:17] <Snowolf> slon02: A7 does *not* apply to school, you'll have to prod it if you want

[19:01] <SigmaWP> barts1a: Then go AfD or PROD it [19:02] <barts1a> Alright I'll prod it

[19:05] <mabdul|ping> PROD? [21:21] <LL2|JedIRC> Hence why the prod template will subst into with the <!-- comments -->

&prod;_''i'' ''A''_''i'' &prod;_''i'' ''X''_''i''<br>

[20:44] <Stalin> Go PROD it

...l work. Got reviewed by original author and I did test it in both beta and prod :-] ...Green> andrewbogott: aluminium really has no business being puppetized on prod puppet anymore

[21:34] <log> funnyfarm299: I'd PROD it [23:00] <foks> put it up for AfD or PROD it

...uft and sitting around for months or years without improvement, it goes to PROD.

...'' or ''parallel'' styles favor ''sums of products'' <math>(\textstyle\sum\prod)</math> as canonical forms of expression, pulling sums, unions, co-products ...cative'' or ''serial'' styles favor ''products of sums'' <math>(\textstyle\prod\sum)</math> as canonical forms of expression, pulling products, intersectio

[16:39] <SigmaWP> We need a prod-3 template [16:40] <Earwig> "I prod this article." "Me too!" "Me three!"?

14:53 * Maryana removes prod template! 16:12 < BarkingFish> nothing prevents prod removal. it's precautionary

[18:26] <Ryulong> Neelix has been tagging several articles with {{prod}} and when I remove them because I firmly believe that the subject is notab

[16:24] <SpeakFree> Great so then I won't have to PROD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto :P [20:05] <Steven_Zhang> to PROD?

�06[22:41] * SigmaWP is currently deciding between prod and afd [22:44] <log> SigmaWP: Definitely AfD it. The PROD would be removed very quickly.

10:37 < Shirik> blp-prod was the result of an RFC iirc 10:37 < Ironholds> Isarra: NOINDEXing new pages, BLP-PROD, wider people having access to AFT5

[00:56:58] <git> i'm very tempted just to throw a prod on it :P

...o: and, uh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammadi%27s_hill, which I just PROD'ed

...> KFP: ...and because there's no proper CSD tag I'll have to either AfD or PROD that. ...oley4: I can't CSD that, because there is no CSD tag about it, so I'll AfD/PROD it

...mat changes and not significant content, even so I'd be inclined to go via PROD. 10:52 < Anna_Frodesiak> prod fine

[20:30] <TParis> SigmaWP: I've thrown a PROD on it

...<Ks0stm> SigmaWP: That particular one I'd be more inclined to wait on the PROD

May 06 16:12:56 <jps> I would prod it gently from a cellphone ...an event held by a regional club with a big name), but it *may* warrant a prod or an afd discussion instead of outright deletion.

[15:13] <{Soap}> "expired PROD" heh

...Ironholds> Cyberpower678: if you can point me to the MW page I'm happy to prod it with ye olde admin tools (unless it's hard-coded, which would be...weird 15:06 < Cyberpower678> Ironholds, prod what?

[16:12] <ToAruShiroiNeko> Because {{Prod}}ego

[20:50] <funnyfarm299> Soapy, prod it?

[16:14] <Steven_Zhang> I might prod it. That reference in the lede is actually a link to another wiki :p

07:05 < russavia> and i'll do my best to prod it along in that direction ;) 10:25 < Qcoder00> I'm using a PROD

May 02 04:29:43 <Guerillero> don't waste the PROD May 02 04:29:51 <Logan_> the PROD was removed

�06[19:54] * SigmaWP saw a prod get deleted out of process [19:54] <kylu> Sigma: well, nobody opposed to the prod, did they? :D

[23:05] <Ironholds> so you can prod them into letting you to go DC if necessary

13:58 < eeekster> is it enough to avoid a BLP PROD? 21:34 < jorgeluis> Just don't mention it and prod ego won't see.

[19:36] <Fluffernutter> SigmaWP, BLP prod and speedy deletion are two different processes

...an> also, Sceptre, if you're that bothered, stick it on your watchlist and prod in a month

00:49 < Keegan> SigmaWP: I'd prod that, not CSD. Now BACK IN THE DAY I'd delete it, but the school gets goog

21:12 < MJ94> (poke prod GorillaWarfare SoapX )

11:01 < Qcoder00> (on API calls) I PRODed them... They removed the PROD tag... So I took them to AFD , and then they AFD tags were removed...

17:59 < Frood> controversial? decline speedy, AfD/prod

May 07 21:25:16 <tommorris> mostly to see if it might prod them into actually doing something

14:39 < BarkingFish> anyway, anyone else? wiktionary, prod as dicdef, csd or afd?

...ChrisGualtieri> Sweet I managed to get lucky and find the studio for that PROD. >.> Its all in Japanese though, but I got the staff credits!

May 02 04:29:43 <Guerillero> don't waste the PROD May 02 04:29:51 <Logan_> the PROD was removed

[22:15] <D_> Oh boy, an article with 11 cleanup tags and an expired PROD [19:41] <iTAC> SigmaWP: Put a PROD on it.

[15:57] <git> {{prod}} [00:42] <Chillum> anyone here I can prod?

[18:02] <Frood> controversial? decline speedy, AfD/prod