Search results

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday January 22, 2026
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ** {{Usenet|comp.home.automation|
    3 KB (448 words) - 18:25, 10 January 2009
  • ...e technical support available through Microsoft is provided through online Usenet newsgroups (in the early days it was also provided on CompuServe ). There a
    24 KB (3,789 words) - 15:24, 18 April 2008
  • ...r, Wikipedia draws upon a far more recent tradition dating from the 1980s– Usenet message boards populated mostly by anonymous users. ...al names, and instead allowing the anonymous contribution practices of the Usenet.
    32 KB (5,061 words) - 22:02, 17 May 2009
  • ...hich in early [[2005]] was archiving over 845,000,000 messages posted to [[Usenet]] news/discussion groups.
    13 KB (1,954 words) - 21:34, 15 January 2007
  • ...ff-site message boards to try to get people to visit their site, polluting Usenet groups with endless insults, off-topic questions, and other ploys to get pe
    31 KB (5,286 words) - 21:41, 22 October 2010
  • ...that offered gateways into, then later merged with, the Internet include [[Usenet]] and [[BITNET]]. Various other commercial and educational networks, such a ...]s and [[MOO]]s being conducted on university servers, and humor-related [[Usenet]] groups receiving much of the main traffic. Today, many [[Internet forum]]
    49 KB (7,310 words) - 14:24, 14 July 2010
  • ...("home made"), private [[file sharing]] between friends, as well as via [[Usenet]], [[Internet forum|forums]], [[Internet Relay Chat]] (IRC) and [[peer to p
    30 KB (4,617 words) - 13:21, 29 November 2008
  • 3. USENET newsgroups "sci.med.vision" and "alt.lasik-eyes", from before 2002. Archiv
    41 KB (6,597 words) - 21:00, 22 November 2007
  • [18:37] <geniice> tommorris usenet I would assume
    73 KB (9,693 words) - 23:07, 24 January 2015
  • ...Ann Coulter myself, but acting that way is beyond the bounds of Wikipedia. Usenet type spamming is discussing an issue rather than how to write the article. ...there is any contention. Spamming has nothing to do with discussion. Both Usenet and the discussion pages are intended for discussion. Save the term spammin
    209 KB (33,239 words) - 17:04, 25 September 2008
  • �06[22:33] * Jeff_G was on Usenet using a DEC system running 4.3bsd-beta in 1985.
    106 KB (13,708 words) - 03:12, 24 January 2015
  • May 06 02:49:51 <geniice> nah porn dates back to the usenet days at least May 06 06:16:52 <Matthewedwards> or Usenet :(
    297 KB (40,196 words) - 02:15, 25 January 2015
  • [17:46] <RexxS> usenet was exactly the same
    216 KB (27,298 words) - 15:30, 14 January 2015
  • May 07 17:28:31 <Qcoder00> USENET?
    224 KB (30,451 words) - 02:17, 25 January 2015
  • 07:34 < Qcoder02> for USENET
    211 KB (30,290 words) - 00:10, 24 January 2015
  • 22:38 < mareklug> PinkAmpersand in 1997 a lawyer was disbarred for internet/usenet spamming in Tennessee (for a year), but he was a real nuissance, not what y
    250 KB (36,347 words) - 23:46, 20 January 2015
  • May 06 02:49:51 <geniice> nah porn dates back to the usenet days at least May 06 06:16:52 <Matthewedwards> or Usenet :(
    1.58 MB (215,511 words) - 23:33, 28 January 2015
  • ..., chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists.
    1.63 MB (214,268 words) - 16:57, 8 February 2015