Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 12, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 598: Line 598:  
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
   −
====Note 9.====
+
====Note 9. Peirce (CE 1, 280&ndash;281)====
   −
<pre>
+
<blockquote>
| But these three principles must have this in common that they refer to 'symbolization'
+
<p>But these three principles must have this in common that they refer to ''symbolization'' for they are principles of inference which is symbolization.  As grounds of the possibility of inference they must refer to the possibility of symbolization or symbolizability.  And as logical principles they must relate to the reference of symbols to objects;  for logic has been defined as the science of the general conditions of the relations of symbols to objects.  But as three different principles they must state three different relations of symbols to objects.  Now we already found that a symbol has three different relations to objects;  namely, connotation, denotation, and information, which are its relations to the object considered as a thing, a form, and an equivalent representation.  Hence, it is obvious that these three principles must relate to the symbolizability of things, of forms, and of symbols.</p>
| for they are principles of inference which is symbolization.  As grounds of the
+
 
| possibility of inference they must refer to the possibility of symbolization or
+
<p>C.S. Peirce, ''Chronological Edition'', CE 1, 280&ndash;281</p>
| symbolizability.  And as logical principles they must relate to the reference
+
 
| of symbols to objects;  for logic has been defined as the science of the
+
<p>Charles Sanders Peirce, "Harvard Lectures ''On the Logic of Science''" (1865), ''Writings of Charles S. Peirce : A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857&ndash;1866'', Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.</p>
| general conditions of the relations of symbols to objects.  But as three
+
</blockquote>
| different principles they must state three different relations of
  −
| symbols to objects.  Now we already found that a symbol has three
  −
| different relations to objects;  namely, connotation, denotation,
  −
| and information, which are its relations to the object considered
  −
| as a thing, a form, and an equivalent representation.  Hence,
  −
| it is obvious that these three principles must relate to
  −
| the symbolizability of things, of forms, and of symbols.
  −
|
  −
| C.S. Peirce, 'Chronological Edition', CE 1, pp. 280-281.
  −
|
  −
| Charles Sanders Peirce, "Harvard Lectures 'On the Logic of Science'", (1865),
  −
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
  −
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
  −
</pre>
      
====Note 10.====
 
====Note 10.====
12,080

edits

Navigation menu