Changes

→‎Rachel Marsden affair: No need to do battle with anonymous idiots.
Line 98: Line 98:  
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
   −
There is curiously only a brief mention of this episode in the anonymous-edit-protected Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales article about Jimmy Wales], even though it was the talk of mainstream media for the better part of March 2008 (note, this doesn't say "better part of a year", as ''Emkorial'' tries to claim on Ars Technica; here are about [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Rachel+Marsden%22+Wales&btnG=Search&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 70 links to media mentions] for you, Emkorial; it's amazing how much people can botch the truth even as they're complaining about the veracity of a document).  Compare, there is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Gibson_DUI_incident an entire article] about Mel Gibson's DUI incident; an article which any anonymous IP address can edit and malign.  Not so, Jimmy Wales' article.  He merits special editorial favors, it would appear.
+
There is curiously only a brief mention of this episode in the anonymous-edit-protected Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales article about Jimmy Wales], even though it was the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Rachel+Marsden%22+Wales&btnG=Search&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 talk of mainstream media] for the better part of March 2008.  Compare, there is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Gibson_DUI_incident an entire article] about Mel Gibson's DUI incident; an article which any anonymous IP address can edit and malign.  Not so, Jimmy Wales' article.  He merits special protective editorial favors, it would appear.
    
==Misspending Foundation funds==
 
==Misspending Foundation funds==