MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday May 01, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
203 bytes added
, 13:29, 29 May 2009
Line 3,691: |
Line 3,691: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |
− | | <math>\operatorname{E}f(x_1, \ldots, x_k, \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k) ~=~ f(x_1 + \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, x_k + \operatorname{d}x_k).</math> | + | | <math>\operatorname{E}f(x_1, \ldots, x_k, \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k) ~=~ f(x_1 + \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, x_k + \operatorname{d}x_k).</math> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 3,702: |
Line 3,702: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | Given that this expression uses nothing more than the ''boolean ring'' operations of addition <math>(+)\!</math> and multiplication <math>(\cdot),</math> it is permissible to multiply things out in the usual manner to arrive at the following result: |
− | Given that this expression uses nothing more than the "boolean ring" | |
− | operations of addition (+) and multiplication (·), it is permissible | |
− | to "multiply things out" in the usual manner to arrive at the result: | |
| | | |
− | Ef(x, y, dx, dy) = x·y + x·dy + y·dx + dx·dy.
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\operatorname{E}f(x, y, \operatorname{d}x, \operatorname{d}y) ~=~ x~y ~+~ x~\operatorname{d}y ~+~ y~\operatorname{d}x ~+~ \operatorname{d}x~\operatorname{d}y.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| To understand what this means in logical terms, for instance, as expressed | | To understand what this means in logical terms, for instance, as expressed |
| in a boolean expansion or a "disjunctive normal form" (DNF), it is perhaps | | in a boolean expansion or a "disjunctive normal form" (DNF), it is perhaps |