Changes

Line 128: Line 128:  
|}
 
|}
   −
Interpreting the formula <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w}\!</math> as <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math> highlights the form of the converse implication that lies inherent in it, and this in turn reveals the analogy between implication and involution that accounts for the aptness of the latter name.
+
Interpreting the formula <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w}\!</math> as <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math> highlights the form of the converse implication inherent in it, and this in turn reveals the analogy between implication and involution that accounts for the aptness of the latter name.
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
12,080

edits