Line 4,899: |
Line 4,899: |
| | | |
| One more example and one more general observation, and then we will be all caught up with our homework on Peirce's "number of" function. | | One more example and one more general observation, and then we will be all caught up with our homework on Peirce's "number of" function. |
| + | |
| + | '''NOF 4.4''' |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> | | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> |
| | | | | |
| <p>So if men are just as apt to be black as things in general:</p> | | <p>So if men are just as apt to be black as things in general:</p> |
− | | + | |- |
− | : <p>[''m'',][''b''] = [''m'',''b'']</p>
| + | | align="center" | <math>[\mathrm{m,}][\mathrm{b}] ~=~ [\mathrm{m,}\mathrm{b}]</math> |
− | | + | |- |
− | <p>where the difference between [''m''] and [''m'',] must not be overlooked.</p> | + | | |
| + | <p>where the difference between <math>[\mathrm{m}]\!</math> and <math>[\mathrm{m,}]\!</math> must not be overlooked.</p> |
| | | |
| <p>(Peirce, CP 3.76).</p> | | <p>(Peirce, CP 3.76).</p> |
Line 4,913: |
Line 4,916: |
| The protasis, "men are just as apt to be black as things in general", is elliptic in structure, and presents us with a potential ambiguity. If we had no further clue to its meaning, it might be read as either of the following: | | The protasis, "men are just as apt to be black as things in general", is elliptic in structure, and presents us with a potential ambiguity. If we had no further clue to its meaning, it might be read as either of the following: |
| | | |
− | : Men are just as apt to be black as things in general are apt to be black.
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | valign="top" | 1. |
| + | | Men are just as apt to be black as things in general are apt to be black. |
| + | |- |
| + | | valign="top" | 2. |
| + | | Men are just as apt to be black as men are apt to be things in general. |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | : Men are just as apt to be black as men are apt to be things in general.
| + | The second interpretation, if grammatical, is pointless to state, since it equates a proper contingency with an absolute certainty. So I think it is safe to assume this paraphrase of what Peirce intends: |
| | | |
− | The second interpretation, if grammatical, is pointless to state, since it equates a proper contingency with an absolute certainty.
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
− | | + | | <p>Men are just as likely to be black as things in general are likely to be black.</p> |
− | So I think it is safe to assume this paraphrase of what Peirce intends:
| + | |} |
− | | |
− | : Men are just as likely to be black as things in general are likely to be black.
| |
| | | |
| Stated in terms of the conditional probability: | | Stated in terms of the conditional probability: |