Bureaucrats, Check users, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, vuser
9,362
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchCriticism of crowdsourcing (view source)
Revision as of 03:59, 11 October 2008
, 03:59, 11 October 2008→Format: We should probably start casting our votes.
::Appears amateur
::Appears amateur
::More likely to cause conflict, especially between "problem" users
::More likely to cause conflict, especially between "problem" users
:'''Do you vote for this?'''
===Wiki===
===Wiki===
::Discussion between parties gets lost in "consensus" of page
::Discussion between parties gets lost in "consensus" of page
::Using the same format as that of the subject that one is trying to describe may not be a valid way of producing analysis, especially if the same core principles (ie NPOV, "consensus") are used. It's perhaps important to "think outside the of box".
::Using the same format as that of the subject that one is trying to describe may not be a valid way of producing analysis, especially if the same core principles (ie NPOV, "consensus") are used. It's perhaps important to "think outside the of box".
:'''Do you vote for this?'''
::I think this is the way I'm leaning, but I reserve the right to change my mind. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 20:59, 10 October 2008 (PDT)
===A combination of Message Board/Wiki===
===Combination of Message Board/Wiki===
:'''Pros'''
:'''Pros'''
::Is already the "setup" at the WR, with the message board and the "blog". That part of the WR model seems to work quite well.
::Is already the "setup" at the WR, with the message board and the "blog". That part of the WR model seems to work quite well.
::Some information may get lost in the process of sifting through the posts made to the message board.
::Some information may get lost in the process of sifting through the posts made to the message board.
::Using a separate system with the message board being the only area accessible to pseudonymous contributors might make the area attractive to vandals and other attention-seeking individuals.
::Using a separate system with the message board being the only area accessible to pseudonymous contributors might make the area attractive to vandals and other attention-seeking individuals.
:'''Do you vote for this?'''
===Blog, with "closed" team of editors===
:'''Pros'''
::Continuity and quality of message
::"Outsiders" can participate through lively Comment fields
:'''Cons'''
::Seems "closed" to collaboration
::Limited set of creative thoughts and opinions
:'''Do you vote for this?'''
===Mailing list===
:'''Pros'''
::Wide reach for participation
:'''Cons'''
::Moderating rules could be challenging
::Is the content history fully searchable?
:'''Do you vote for this?'''
==Name ideas==
==Name ideas==
