Changes

==Name ideas==

==Name ideas==

What might we call this site?

What might we call this site?

:Criticism of Crowdsourcing

:Wrongs of the Internet

:Rethinking Free Culture

: Criticism of Crowdsourcing

:Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is trademarked.  Can we use this name?  ) or WikiAnalysis

: Wrongs of the Internet

:WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school...although this might not work for an international audience)

: Rethinking Free Culture

:Center for Internet Criticism

: Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is trademarked.  Can we use this name?  ) or WikiAnalysis

:Internet Ethics Report

: WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school … although this might not work for an international audience)

:Internet Concerns

: Center for Internet Criticism

:The Folly of Crowds

: Internet Ethics Report

:CyberCulture Review

: Internet Concerns

: The Folly of Crowds

: CyberCulture Review

One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral.  A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject.  It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.

One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral.  A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject.  It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.