Line 3,381: |
Line 3,381: |
| ===Commentary Note 11.23=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.23=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | Let me try to sum up as succinctly as possible the lesson that we ought to take away from Peirce's last "number of" example, since I know that the account that I have given of it so far may appear to have wandered rather widely. |
− | Let me try to sum up as succinctly as possible the lesson | + | |
− | that we ought to take away from Peirce's last "number of" | + | <blockquote> |
− | example, since I know that the account that I have given | + | <p>So if men are just as apt to be black as things in general:</p> |
− | of it so far may appear to have wandered rather widely. | + | |
| + | : <p>[''m'',][''b''] = [''m'',''b'']</p> |
| + | |
| + | <p>where the difference between [m] and [m,] must not be overlooked.</p> |
| | | |
− | | So if men are just as apt to be black as things in general:
| + | <p>C.S. Peirce, CP 3.76</p> |
− | |
| + | </blockquote> |
− | | [m,][b] = [m,b]
| |
− | |
| |
− | | where the difference between [m] and [m,] must not be overlooked.
| |
− | |
| |
− | | C.S. Peirce, CP 3.76
| |
| | | |
− | In different lights the formula [m,b] = [m,][b] presents itself | + | In different lights the formula [''m'',''b''] = [''m'',][''b''] presents itself as an "aimed arrow", "fair sample", or "independence" condition. I had taken the tack of illustrating this polymorphous theme in bas relief, that is, via detour through a universe of discourse where it fails. Here's a brief reminder of the Othello example: |
− | as an "aimed arrow", "fair sample", or "independence" condition. | |
− | I had taken the tack of illustrating this polymorphous theme in | |
− | bas relief, that is, via detour through a universe of discourse | |
− | where it fails. Here's a brief reminder of the Othello example: | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| B C D E I J O | | B C D E I J O |
| o o o o o o o 1 | | o o o o o o o 1 |
Line 3,412: |
Line 3,407: |
| o o o o o o o 1 | | o o o o o o o 1 |
| B C D E I J O | | B C D E I J O |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | The condition, "men are just as apt to be black as things in general", | + | The condition, "men are just as apt to be black as things in general", is expressible in terms of conditional probabilities as P(''b''|''m'') = P(''b''), written out, the probability of the event Black given the event Male is exactly equal to the unconditional probability of the event Black. |
− | is expressible in terms of conditional probabilities as P(b|m) = P(b), | |
− | written out, the probability of the event Black given the event Male | |
− | is exactly equal to the unconditional probability of the event Black. | |
| | | |
− | Thus, for example, it is sufficient to observe in the Othello setting | + | Thus, for example, it is sufficient to observe in the Othello setting that P(''b''|''m'') = 1/4 while P(''b'') = 1/7 in order to cognize the dependency, and thereby to tell that the ostensible arrow is anaclinically biased. |
− | that P(b|m) = 1/4 while P(b) = 1/7 in order to cognize the dependency, | |
− | and thereby to tell that the ostensible arrow is anaclinically biased. | |
| | | |
− | This reduction of a conditional probability to an absolute probability, | + | This reduction of a conditional probability to an absolute probability, in the form P(''A''|''Z'') = P(''A''), is a familiar disguise, and yet in practice one of the ways that we most commonly come to recognize the condition of independence P(''AZ'') = P(''A'')P(''Z''), via the definition of a conditional probability according to the rule P(''A''|''Z'') = P(''AZ'')/P(''Z''). To recall the familiar consequences, the definition of conditional probability plus the independence condition yields P(''A''|''Z'') = P(''AZ'')/P(''Z'') = P(''A'')P(''Z'')/P(''Z''), to wit, P(''A''|''Z'') = P(''A''). |
− | in the form P(A|Z) = P(A), is a familiar disguise, and yet in practice | |
− | one of the ways that we most commonly come to recognize the condition | |
− | of independence P(AZ) = P(A)P(Z), via the definition of a conditional | |
− | probability according to the rule P(A|Z) = P(AZ)/P(Z). To recall the | |
− | familiar consequences, the definition of conditional probability plus | |
− | the independence condition yields P(A|Z) = P(AZ)/P(Z) = P(A)P(Z)/P(Z), | |
− | to wit, P(A|Z) = P(A). | |
| | | |
| As Hamlet discovered, there's a lot to be learned from turning a crank. | | As Hamlet discovered, there's a lot to be learned from turning a crank. |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 11.24=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.24=== |