Line 228: |
Line 228: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | Starting from the standpoint of systems theory a sizable handicap must be | + | Starting from the standpoint of systems theory a sizable handicap must be overcome in the quest to figure out: "What's in the brain that ink may character?" and "Where is fancy bred?" (McCulloch, 1965). If localized deposits of historical records and promissory notes are all that can be found, a considerable amount of reconstruction may be necessary to grasp the living reality of experience and purpose that underlies them still. A distinction must be made between the analytic or functional structure of the phase space of a system and the anatomical structure of a hypothetical agent to whom these states are attributed. The separation of a system into environment and organism and the further detection of anatomical structure within the organism depend on a direct product decomposition of the space into relatively independent components whose interactions can be treated secondarily. But the direct product is a comparatively advanced stage of decomposition and not to be expected in every case. |
− | overcome in the quest to figure out: "What's in the brain that ink may | |
− | character?" and "Where is fancy bred?" (McCulloch, 1965). If localized deposits | |
− | of historical records and promissory notes are all that can be found, a | |
− | considerable amount of reconstruction may be necessary to grasp the living | |
− | reality of experience and purpose that underlies them still. A distinction must | |
− | be made between the analytic or functional structure of the phase space of a | |
− | system and the anatomical structure of a hypothetical agent to whom these states | |
− | are attributed. The separation of a system into environment and organism and | |
− | the further detection of anatomical structure within the organism depend on a | |
− | direct product decomposition of the space into relatively independent components | |
− | whose interactions can be treated secondarily. But the direct product is a | |
− | comparatively advanced stage of decomposition and not to be expected in every | |
− | case. | |
| | | |
− | This point draws the chase back through the briar patch of that earlier | + | This point draws the chase back through the briar patch of that earlier complexity theory, the prime decomposition or group complexity theory of finite automata and their associated formal languages or transformation semigroups (Lallement, ch. 4). This more general study requires the use of semi-direct products (Rotman, 1984) and their ultimate extension into wreath products or cascade products, along with the corresponding notions of divisibility, factorization, or decomposition (Barr & Wells, 1990, ch. 11). This theory seems to have reached a baroque stage of development, either too difficult to pursue with vigor, too lacking in applications, or falling short of some essential insight. It looks like another one of those problem areas that will need to be revisited on the way to integrating AI and systems theory. |
− | complexity theory, the prime decomposition or group complexity theory of finite | |
− | automata and their associated formal languages or transformation semigroups | |
− | (Lallement, ch. 4). This more general study requires the use of semi-direct | |
− | products (Rotman, 1984) and their ultimate extension into wreath products or | |
− | cascade products, along with the corresponding notions of divisibility, | |
− | factorization, or decomposition (Barr & Wells, 1990, ch. 11). This theory seems | |
− | to have reached a baroque stage of development, either too difficult to pursue | |
− | with vigor, too lacking in applications, or falling short of some essential | |
− | insight. It looks like another one of those problem areas that will need to be | |
− | revisited on the way to integrating AI and systems theory. | |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| =====1.2.2.2. Statements, Questions, Commands===== | | =====1.2.2.2. Statements, Questions, Commands===== |