Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday June 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
484 bytes added ,  15:57, 4 December 2006
Line 22: Line 22:     
:: We will probably have to discuss this "month/day" format, or I will have to spend some time thinking about it.  I just don't understand it yet; but as a layman, it just seems awfully odd when we get these pages like "December/20".  But, you're saying that the Wikipedia method of "December_20" would not work well within semantic search?  I guess I get it -- people may want to search for either December, or December 20, but if the label is "December_20", that won't work for the "just any December" searches. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 18:47, 3 December 2006 (PST)
 
:: We will probably have to discuss this "month/day" format, or I will have to spend some time thinking about it.  I just don't understand it yet; but as a layman, it just seems awfully odd when we get these pages like "December/20".  But, you're saying that the Wikipedia method of "December_20" would not work well within semantic search?  I guess I get it -- people may want to search for either December, or December 20, but if the label is "December_20", that won't work for the "just any December" searches. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 18:47, 3 December 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
:::Exactly. December_20 & December/20 aren't really that different from a straight text reference perspective. Actually, I think Centiare's method is better, since day dates are natural sub-pages of months. Either way, once a reader is on the Dec 20 page, ASK can run queries on that specific date eg births, deaths, etc. That is, as long as the semantic tags record the '''individual data elements''' as to month, day & year. [[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 07:57, 4 December 2006 (PST)
    
==Edit notes==
 
==Edit notes==
3,699

edits

Navigation menu