Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| | | |
| o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | IDS. Note 1
| + | ==1. Introduction== |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ===1.1. Outline of the Project : Inquiry Into Inquiry=== |
| | | |
− | Inquiry Driven Systems: An Inquiry Into Inquiry
| + | ====1.1.1. Problem==== |
− | | |
− | 1. Introduction
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1. Outline of the Project: Inquiry Into Inquiry
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.1. Problem | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| This research is oriented toward a single problem: | | This research is oriented toward a single problem: |
| | | |
Line 39: |
Line 35: |
| the general trend of all forms of reasoning that lead to the features | | the general trend of all forms of reasoning that lead to the features |
| of scientific investigation as their ultimate development. | | of scientific investigation as their ultimate development. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.1.2. Method==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 2
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.2. Method | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| How will I approach this problem about the nature of inquiry? | | How will I approach this problem about the nature of inquiry? |
| | | |
Line 101: |
Line 93: |
| Taking these initial stages into consideration, I can describe the main | | Taking these initial stages into consideration, I can describe the main |
| modalities of this research in greater detail. | | modalities of this research in greater detail. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.1.2.1. The Paradigmatic and Process-Analytic Phase===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 3
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.2.1. The Paradigmatic and Process-Analytic Phase | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In this phase I describe the performance and the competence | | In this phase I describe the performance and the competence |
| of intelligent agents in terms of a variety of formal systems: | | of intelligent agents in terms of a variety of formal systems: |
Line 154: |
Line 142: |
| that is to say, a testable (defeasible or falsifiable) construal of how a process | | that is to say, a testable (defeasible or falsifiable) construal of how a process |
| is actually, might be possibly, or ought to be optimally carried out. | | is actually, might be possibly, or ought to be optimally carried out. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.1.2.2. The Paraphrastic and Faculty-Synthetic Phase===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 4
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.2.2. The Paraphrastic and Faculty-Synthetic Phase | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The closely allied techniques of task analysis and software development that are | | The closely allied techniques of task analysis and software development that are |
| known as "step-wise refinement" and "top-down programming" in computer science | | known as "step-wise refinement" and "top-down programming" in computer science |
Line 194: |
Line 178: |
| the design of computer programs that can fulfill them, at least, | | the design of computer programs that can fulfill them, at least, |
| to whatever extent makes sense with regard to the ends in view. | | to whatever extent makes sense with regard to the ends in view. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.1.2.3. Reprise of Methods===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 5
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.2.3. Reprise of Methods | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The whole array of methods will be typical of the "top-down" strategies | | The whole array of methods will be typical of the "top-down" strategies |
| used in artificial intelligence research, involving the conceptual and | | used in artificial intelligence research, involving the conceptual and |
Line 220: |
Line 200: |
| the runners, shoots, and tendrils of research tend to interleave | | the runners, shoots, and tendrils of research tend to interleave |
| and intertwine as they will. | | and intertwine as they will. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.1.3. Criterion==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 6
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.3. Criterion | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| When is enough enough? What measure can I use to tell if my effort is working? | | When is enough enough? What measure can I use to tell if my effort is working? |
| What information is critical in deciding whether my exercise of the method is | | What information is critical in deciding whether my exercise of the method is |
Line 251: |
Line 227: |
| less hesitation, more determination is manifested by | | less hesitation, more determination is manifested by |
| less vacillation. | | less vacillation. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.1.4. Application==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 7
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.1.4. Application | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Where can the results be used? | | Where can the results be used? |
| | | |
Line 277: |
Line 249: |
| logic (the normative study of how we ought to think in order to accomplish | | logic (the normative study of how we ought to think in order to accomplish |
| the goals of reasoning). | | the goals of reasoning). |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ===1.2. Onus of the Project: No Way But Inquiry=== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 8
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.2. Onus of the Project: No Way But Inquiry | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| At the beginning of inquiry there is nothing for me to work with | | At the beginning of inquiry there is nothing for me to work with |
| but the actual constellation of doubts and beliefs that I have at | | but the actual constellation of doubts and beliefs that I have at |
Line 305: |
Line 273: |
| patterns of strategy are routinely more successful in the long run | | patterns of strategy are routinely more successful in the long run |
| than others. | | than others. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.2.1. A Modulating Prelude==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 9
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.2.1. A Modulating Prelude | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| If I aim to devise the kind of computational support that can give the | | If I aim to devise the kind of computational support that can give the |
| greatest assistance to inquiry, then it must be able to come in at the | | greatest assistance to inquiry, then it must be able to come in at the |
Line 344: |
Line 308: |
| in their specific contents and peculiar to the states of the | | in their specific contents and peculiar to the states of the |
| particular agents to which they attach. | | particular agents to which they attach. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.2.2. A Fugitive Canon==== |
| | | |
− | IDS. Note 10
| + | <pre> |
− | | + | The principal difficulties associated with |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | this task appear to spring from two roots. |
− | | |
− | 1.2.2. A Fugitive Canon
| |
− | | |
− | The principal difficulties associated with | |
− | this task appear to spring from two roots. | |
| | | |
| First, there is the issue of "computational mediation". In using the sorts | | First, there is the issue of "computational mediation". In using the sorts |
Line 374: |
Line 334: |
| experiences of oneself and others, but in points of form to compare | | experiences of oneself and others, but in points of form to compare |
| them with the structures present in mathematical models? | | them with the structures present in mathematical models? |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ===1.3. Option of the Project : A Way Up To Inquiry=== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 11
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3. Option of the Project: A Way Up To Inquiry | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| I begin with an informal examination of the concept of inquiry. | | I begin with an informal examination of the concept of inquiry. |
| | | |
Line 425: |
Line 381: |
| serve as proxies for unknown components and indicate tentative | | serve as proxies for unknown components and indicate tentative |
| analyses of faculties in question. | | analyses of faculties in question. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.3.1. Initial Analysis of Inquiry -- Allegro Aperto==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 12
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.1. Initial Analysis of Inquiry -- Allegro Aperto | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| If the faculty of inquiry is a coherent power, then it has | | If the faculty of inquiry is a coherent power, then it has |
| an active or instrumental face, a passive or objective face, | | an active or instrumental face, a passive or objective face, |
Line 455: |
Line 407: |
| In accord with this plan, the main body of this Division (1.3) is devoted | | In accord with this plan, the main body of this Division (1.3) is devoted |
| to a discussion of formalization. y_0 = y y >= {d, f}{d, f} >= {f}{d}. | | to a discussion of formalization. y_0 = y y >= {d, f}{d, f} >= {f}{d}. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.3.2. Discussion of Discussion==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 13
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.2. Discussion of Discussion | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| But first, I nearly skipped a step. Though it might present itself as | | But first, I nearly skipped a step. Though it might present itself as |
| an interruption, a topic so easy that I almost omitted it altogether | | an interruption, a topic so easy that I almost omitted it altogether |
Line 485: |
Line 433: |
| digressionary narrative into a properly directed inquiry. This brings | | digressionary narrative into a properly directed inquiry. This brings |
| an end to my initial discussion of "discussion". | | an end to my initial discussion of "discussion". |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.3.3. Discussion of Formalization : General Topics==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 14
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3. Discussion of Formalization: General Topics | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Because this project makes constant use of formal models | | Because this project makes constant use of formal models |
| of phenomenal processes, it is incumbent on me at this | | of phenomenal processes, it is incumbent on me at this |
Line 499: |
Line 443: |
| that I will use throughout this work and to preview | | that I will use throughout this work and to preview |
| a concrete example of its application. | | a concrete example of its application. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | 1.3.3.1. A Formal Charge | + | =====1.3.3.1. A Formal Charge===== |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| An introduction to the topic of formalization, if proper, | | An introduction to the topic of formalization, if proper, |
| is obliged to begin informally. But it will be my constant | | is obliged to begin informally. But it will be my constant |
Line 530: |
Line 476: |
| out the form, if not the substance, of what it | | out the form, if not the substance, of what it |
| does, or an aspect thereof. | | does, or an aspect thereof. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.2. A Formalization of Formalization?===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 15
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.2. A Formalization of Formalization? | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| An immediate application of the above rules is presented here, in hopes of | | An immediate application of the above rules is presented here, in hopes of |
| giving the reader a concrete illustration of their use in a ready example, | | giving the reader a concrete illustration of their use in a ready example, |
Line 589: |
Line 531: |
| in its present state of completion would be far too tedious and tenuous | | in its present state of completion would be far too tedious and tenuous |
| to escape expurgation. | | to escape expurgation. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion?===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 16
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion? | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The previous Subsection took the concept of "formalization" as an example | | The previous Subsection took the concept of "formalization" as an example |
| of a topic that a writer might try to translate from informal discussion | | of a topic that a writer might try to translate from informal discussion |
Line 628: |
Line 566: |
| Just what is involved in achieving the object of a motivated discussion? | | Just what is involved in achieving the object of a motivated discussion? |
| Can these intentions be formalized? y_0 = y y >= {d, f}{d, f} >= {d}{f}. | | Can these intentions be formalized? y_0 = y y >= {d, f}{d, f} >= {d}{f}. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 17
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion? (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| The writer's task is not to create meaning from nothing, | | The writer's task is not to create meaning from nothing, |
Line 701: |
Line 631: |
| the reader's part that is extensible in non-trivial ways. | | the reader's part that is extensible in non-trivial ways. |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | At this point, the discussion has touched on a topic, in one of its |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 18
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion? (concl.)
| |
− | | |
− | At this point, the discussion has touched on a topic, in one of its | |
| manifold aspects, that it will encounter repeatedly, under a variety | | manifold aspects, that it will encounter repeatedly, under a variety |
| of aspects, throughout this work. In recognition of this circumstance, | | of aspects, throughout this work. In recognition of this circumstance, |
Line 731: |
Line 653: |
| together into the qualifications of inquiry and a definition | | together into the qualifications of inquiry and a definition |
| of what exactly is desired in order to constitute knowledge? | | of what exactly is desired in order to constitute knowledge? |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.4. A Concept of Formalization===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 19
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.4. A Concept of Formalization | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The concept of formalization is intended to cover the whole collection | | The concept of formalization is intended to cover the whole collection |
| of activities that serve to build a relation between casual discussions, | | of activities that serve to build a relation between casual discussions, |
Line 759: |
Line 677: |
| the object language, the domain of structures and processes that can be | | the object language, the domain of structures and processes that can be |
| studied as a completely formalized object. | | studied as a completely formalized object. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 20
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| I plan to approach the issue of formalization from a slightly different angle, | | I plan to approach the issue of formalization from a slightly different angle, |
| proceeding through an analysis of the medium of interpretation and developing | | proceeding through an analysis of the medium of interpretation and developing |
Line 794: |
Line 708: |
| that serves to convey an appearance of knowledge in a place where very | | that serves to convey an appearance of knowledge in a place where very |
| little is known about the subject itself. | | little is known about the subject itself. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 21
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| A meta-language corresponds to what I call an "interpretive framework". | | A meta-language corresponds to what I call an "interpretive framework". |
Line 829: |
Line 735: |
| they may have little surplus memory capacity to memorandize the big picture, | | they may have little surplus memory capacity to memorandize the big picture, |
| even when these acts of reflection and critique are permitted in principle. | | even when these acts of reflection and critique are permitted in principle. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 22
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| An object language is a special case of the kind of formal system that is | | An object language is a special case of the kind of formal system that is |
Line 867: |
Line 765: |
| permeabilities and a permanent hierarchy of effabilities | | permeabilities and a permanent hierarchy of effabilities |
| in language. | | in language. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 23
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| The grounds of discussion that I'm raking over here constellate a rather | | The grounds of discussion that I'm raking over here constellate a rather |
Line 912: |
Line 802: |
| must be possible to describe it within the frame | | must be possible to describe it within the frame |
| of this informally discursive universe. | | of this informally discursive universe. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.6. A Formal Development===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 24
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.6. A Formal Development | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The point of view I take on the origin and development of formal models | | The point of view I take on the origin and development of formal models |
| is that they arise with agents retracing structures that already exist | | is that they arise with agents retracing structures that already exist |
Line 936: |
Line 822: |
| or an analytically representative recipe, or (3) whether it instead insistently | | or an analytically representative recipe, or (3) whether it instead insistently |
| obscures what portion of its domain it manages to cover. | | obscures what portion of its domain it manages to cover. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.3.7. A Formal Persuasion===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 25
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.3.7. A Formal Persuasion | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| An interpretive system can be taken up with very little fanfare, since it | | An interpretive system can be taken up with very little fanfare, since it |
| does not enjoin one to declare undying allegiance to a particular point of | | does not enjoin one to declare undying allegiance to a particular point of |
Line 980: |
Line 862: |
| of the fact that this is not likely | | of the fact that this is not likely |
| to be a universally shared opinion. | | to be a universally shared opinion. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====1.3.4. Discussion of Formalization : Concrete Examples==== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 26
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4. Discussion of Formalization: Concrete Examples | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Section 1.3.3 outlined a variety of general issues surrounding the concept | | Section 1.3.3 outlined a variety of general issues surrounding the concept |
| of formalization. Section 1.3.5 will plot the specific objectives of this | | of formalization. Section 1.3.5 will plot the specific objectives of this |
Line 998: |
Line 876: |
| that are intended to illustrate the kinds of mathematical objects | | that are intended to illustrate the kinds of mathematical objects |
| I have in mind using as formal models. | | I have in mind using as formal models. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.1. Formal Models : A Sketch===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 27
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.1. Formal Models: A Sketch | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| To sketch as briefly as possible the features of the modeling activity | | To sketch as briefly as possible the features of the modeling activity |
| that are most relevant to our present purpose: The modeler begins with | | that are most relevant to our present purpose: The modeler begins with |
Line 1,056: |
Line 930: |
| the effort to try lifting one or another edge of these frameworks | | the effort to try lifting one or another edge of these frameworks |
| and backdrops into the light, at least for a time. | | and backdrops into the light, at least for a time. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.2. Sign Relations : A Primer===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 28
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.2. Sign Relations: A Primer | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| To the extent that their structures and functions can be discussed at all, | | To the extent that their structures and functions can be discussed at all, |
| it appears likely at this point that all of the formal entities destined | | it appears likely at this point that all of the formal entities destined |
Line 1,090: |
Line 960: |
| of signs is specialized to treat from structural and comparative points | | of signs is specialized to treat from structural and comparative points |
| of view. | | of view. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 29
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.2. Sign Relations: A Primer (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| Because the examples in this Section (1.3.4) have been artificially | | Because the examples in this Section (1.3.4) have been artificially |
Line 1,212: |
Line 1,074: |
| occasionally used in the philosophy of language to point out the needed | | occasionally used in the philosophy of language to point out the needed |
| distinctions. | | distinctions. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 30
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.2. Sign Relations: A Primer (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| One aspect of the meaning of a sign is concerned with the reference | | One aspect of the meaning of a sign is concerned with the reference |
Line 1,263: |
Line 1,117: |
| use have properties that quickly bring the usual prospects of | | use have properties that quickly bring the usual prospects of |
| formal semantics to a screeching halt. | | formal semantics to a screeching halt. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 31
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.2. Sign Relations: A Primer (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| The other dyadic aspects of meaning that might be considered concern | | The other dyadic aspects of meaning that might be considered concern |
Line 1,324: |
Line 1,170: |
| of this material does not interfere with understanding the purely | | of this material does not interfere with understanding the purely |
| formal aspects of the present Example. | | formal aspects of the present Example. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 32
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.2. Sign Relations: A Primer (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| Formally speaking, the connotative and intentional | | Formally speaking, the connotative and intentional |
Line 1,372: |
Line 1,210: |
| of sign relations that form the necessary conditions for achieving these | | of sign relations that form the necessary conditions for achieving these |
| aims and thus for being able to conduct coherently directed inquiries. | | aims and thus for being able to conduct coherently directed inquiries. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.3. Semiotic Equivalence Relations===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 33
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.3. Semiotic Equivalence Relations | |
| | | |
| If one examines the sign relations L(A) and L(B) that are associated with | | If one examines the sign relations L(A) and L(B) that are associated with |
Line 1,422: |
Line 1,255: |
| | "u" | "B" | | | | "u" | "B" | |
| o---------------o---------------o | | o---------------o---------------o |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 34
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.3. Semiotic Equivalence Relations (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| In order to discuss this type of situation further, | | In order to discuss this type of situation further, |
Line 1,494: |
Line 1,319: |
| | | |
| {{"A", "u"}, {"B", "i"}}. | | {{"A", "u"}, {"B", "i"}}. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.4. Graphical Representations===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 35
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.4. Graphical Representations | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| The dyadic components of sign relations can be given graph-theoretic | | The dyadic components of sign relations can be given graph-theoretic |
| representations as "directed graphs", or "digraphs" for short, that | | representations as "directed graphs", or "digraphs" for short, that |
Line 1,531: |
Line 1,352: |
| are involved when the interpreters A and B evaluate the signs in S | | are involved when the interpreters A and B evaluate the signs in S |
| according to their own frames of reference. | | according to their own frames of reference. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 36
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.4. Graphical Representations (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| The connotative components Con L(A) and Con L(B) can be represented | | The connotative components Con L(A) and Con L(B) can be represented |
Line 1,569: |
Line 1,382: |
| different sorts of relational structures on the same set of points, | | different sorts of relational structures on the same set of points, |
| heralds a topic that will be developed extensively in the sequel. | | heralds a topic that will be developed extensively in the sequel. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.5. Taking Stock===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 37
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.5. Taking Stock | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| So far, my discussion of the discussion between A and B, in the picture that | | So far, my discussion of the discussion between A and B, in the picture that |
| it gives of sign relations and their connection to the imagined processes of | | it gives of sign relations and their connection to the imagined processes of |
Line 1,608: |
Line 1,417: |
| clues to significant deficits in theory and technique, and that can serve | | clues to significant deficits in theory and technique, and that can serve |
| to point out directions for future improvements. | | to point out directions for future improvements. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.6. The "Meta" Question===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 38
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.6. The "Meta" Question | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| There is one point of common contention that I finessed from play | | There is one point of common contention that I finessed from play |
| in my handling of the transaction between A and B, even though it | | in my handling of the transaction between A and B, even though it |
Line 1,676: |
Line 1,481: |
| conventional symbols for their objects but fully iconic | | conventional symbols for their objects but fully iconic |
| representations of their objective operative structure. | | representations of their objective operative structure. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.7. Iconic Signs===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 39
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.7. Iconic Signs | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In the pragmatic theory of signs, an "icon" is a sign that accomplishes | | In the pragmatic theory of signs, an "icon" is a sign that accomplishes |
| its representation, including the projects of denotation and connotation, | | its representation, including the projects of denotation and connotation, |
Line 1,762: |
Line 1,563: |
| sign relations would have several portions that look identical to pieces of | | sign relations would have several portions that look identical to pieces of |
| the very sign relational Tables that are being placed under formal review. | | the very sign relational Tables that are being placed under formal review. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.8. The Conflict of Interpretations===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 40
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.8. The Conflict of Interpretations | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| One discrepancy that needs to be documented at this point | | One discrepancy that needs to be documented at this point |
| can be observed in the conflict of interpretations between | | can be observed in the conflict of interpretations between |
Line 1,798: |
Line 1,595: |
| that keeps indexical signs persistently attached to their interpreters | | that keeps indexical signs persistently attached to their interpreters |
| of reference. | | of reference. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 41
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In the pragmatic theory of signs, an "index" is a sign that achieves its | | In the pragmatic theory of signs, an "index" is a sign that achieves its |
| representation of an object by virtue of an actual connection with it. | | representation of an object by virtue of an actual connection with it. |
Line 1,853: |
Line 1,646: |
| necessity "essential connections" to whatever | | necessity "essential connections" to whatever |
| objects they do in fact denote. | | objects they do in fact denote. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 42
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| Saying that an index is a property of an instance of an object almost | | Saying that an index is a property of an instance of an object almost |
Line 1,892: |
Line 1,677: |
| the experience, in this way connecting the diverse abstractions that | | the experience, in this way connecting the diverse abstractions that |
| are called "objects" and "indices", respectively. | | are called "objects" and "indices", respectively. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | IDS. Note 43
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| If a suitable framework of object instances can be found to rationalize | | If a suitable framework of object instances can be found to rationalize |
Line 1,945: |
Line 1,722: |
| with respect to its own presumptuous form of analysis and all of | | with respect to its own presumptuous form of analysis and all of |
| the circular viscosities of its "tacit analytic framework" (TAF). | | the circular viscosities of its "tacit analytic framework" (TAF). |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.10. Sundry Problems===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 44
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.10. Sundry Problems | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| There are moments in the development of an analytic discussion when a | | There are moments in the development of an analytic discussion when a |
| thing initially described as a single object under a single sign needs | | thing initially described as a single object under a single sign needs |
Line 2,013: |
Line 1,786: |
| the moment to moment placement of dynamic elements and systematic | | the moment to moment placement of dynamic elements and systematic |
| components with regard to this underlying field of polarities. | | components with regard to this underlying field of polarities. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.11. Review and Prospect===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 45
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.11. Review and Prospect | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| What has been learned from the foregoing study of icons and indices? | | What has been learned from the foregoing study of icons and indices? |
| The impact of this examination can be sized up in a couple of stages: | | The impact of this examination can be sized up in a couple of stages: |
Line 2,072: |
Line 1,841: |
| it helps to introduce a set of organizing conceptions. Doing this will | | it helps to introduce a set of organizing conceptions. Doing this will |
| be the business of the next four Subsections. | | be the business of the next four Subsections. |
| + | <pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | =====1.3.4.12. Objective Plans and Levels===== |
− | | |
− | IDS. Note 46
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 1.3.4.12. Objective Plans and Levels | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In accounting for the special characteristics of icons and indices | | In accounting for the special characteristics of icons and indices |
| that arose in previous discussions, it became necessary to open up | | that arose in previous discussions, it became necessary to open up |