Changes

===1.4.  Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry===

===1.4.  Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry===

I am using the word ''inquiry'' in a way that is roughly synonymous with the term ''scientific method''.  Use of ''inquiry'' is more convenient, aside from being the shorter term, because of the following advantages:

I am using the word "inquiry" in a way that is roughly synonymous with the

term "scientific method".  Use of "inquiry" is more convenient, aside from

being the shorter term, because of the following advantages:

1.  It allows one to broaden the scope of investigation

# It allows one to broaden the scope of investigation to include any form of proceeding toward knowledge that merely aims at such a method.

    to include any form of proceeding toward knowledge

# It allows one to finesse the issue, for the time being, of how much "method" there is in science.

    that merely aims at such a method.

2.  It allows one to finesse the issue, for the time being,

This Subdivision and the next deal with opposite aspects of inquiry.  In many ways it might have been better to interlace the opposing points of comparison, taking them up in a parallel fashion, but this plan was judged to be too distracting for a first approach.  In other ways, the negative sides of each topic are prior in point of time to the positive sides of the issue, but sensible people like to see the light at the end of the tunnel before they trouble themselves with the obscurities of the intervening journey.  Thus, this Subdivision of the text emphasizes the positive features of inquiry and the positive qualities of its objective, while the next Subdivision is reserved to examine the negative aspects of each question.

    of how much "method" there is in science.

This Subdivision and the next deal with opposite aspects of inquiry.

In the order of nature, the absence of a feature naturally precedes the full development of its presence.  In the order of discussion, however, positive terms must be proposed if it is desired to say anything at all.

In many ways it might have been better to interlace the opposing points

of comparison, taking them up in a parallel fashion, but this plan was

judged to be too distracting for a first approach.  In other ways, the

negative sides of each topic are prior in point of time to the positive

sides of the issue, but sensible people like to see the light at the end

intervening journey.  Thus, this subdivison of the text emphasizes the

positive features of inquiry and the positive qualities of its objective,

while the next Subdivision is reserved to examine the negative aspects

of each question.

In the order of nature, the absence of a feature naturally precedes the

The discussion in this Subdivision is placed to serve a primer, declaring at least the names of enough positive concepts to propose addressing the negative conditions of knowledge in which inquiry necessarily starts.

full development of its presence.  In the order of discussion, however,

positive terms must be proposed if it is desired to say anything at all.

The discussion in this Subdivision is placed to serve a primer, declaring

In this Subdivision I stand back once again from the problem of inquiry and allow myself take a more distant view of the subject, settling into what I think is a comfortable and a natural account of inquiry, the best that I have at my command, and attending to the task of describing its positive features in a positive light.  I present my personal view of inquiry as I currently understand it, without stopping to justify every concept in detail or to examine every objection that might be made to this view.  In the next Subdivision I discuss a few of the more obvious problems that stand in the way of this view and I try to remove a few of the more tractable obscurities that appear ready to be cleared up.  The fact that I treat them as my "personal insights" does not mean that all of these ideas about inquiry originate with me, but only that I have come to adopt them for my personal use.  There will be many occasions, the next time that I go over this ground, to point out the sources of these ideas, so far as I know them.

at least the names of enough positive concepts to propose addressing the

negative conditions of knowledge in which inquiry necessarily starts.

The reader may take my apology for this style of presentation to be implicit in its dogmatic character.  It is done this way in a first approach for the sake of avoiding an immense number of distractions, each of which is not being slighted but demands to be addressed in its own good time.  I want to convey the general drift of my current model, however conjectural, naive, uncritical, and unreflective it may seem.

 

The reader may take my apology for this style of presentation to be

implicit in its dogmatic character.  It is done this way in a first

approach for the sake of avoiding an immense number of distractions,

each of which is not being slighted but demands to be addressed in

its own good time.  I want to convey the general drift of my current

model, however conjectural, naive, uncritical, and unreflective it

may seem.

====1.4.1.  The Matrix of Inquiry====

====1.4.1.  The Matrix of Inquiry====