Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday April 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 829: Line 829:  
|
 
|
 
| (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 666, 351).
 
| (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 666, 351).
</pre>
  −
  −
====1.3.8. Rondeau &mdash; Tempo di Menuetto====
  −
  −
<pre>
  −
| And do you know what "the world" is to me?
  −
| Shall I show it to you in my mirror?
  −
| This world:  a monster of energy, without beginning, without end;
  −
| a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller,
  −
| that does not expend itself but only transforms itself;  as a whole,
  −
| of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but
  −
| likewise without increase or income;  enclosed by "nothingness"
  −
| as by a boundary;  not something blurry or wasted, not something
  −
| endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force,
  −
| and not a space that might be "empty" here or there, but rather as
  −
| force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the
  −
| same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time
  −
| decreasing there;  a sea of forces flowing and rushing together,
  −
| eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years
  −
| of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms;  out of the
  −
| simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest,
  −
| most rigid, coldest forms toward the hottest, most turbulent, most
  −
| self-contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple
  −
| out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back
  −
| to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity
  −
| of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must
  −
| return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust,
  −
| no weariness:  this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self-creating,
  −
| the eternally self-destroying, this mystery world of the twofold
  −
| voluptuous delight, my "beyond good and evil", without goal,
  −
| unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal;  without will,
  −
| unless a ring feels good will toward itself -- do you want
  −
| a name for this world?  A solution for all its riddles?
  −
| A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest,
  −
| most intrepid, most midnightly men? -- This world
  −
| is the will to power -- and nothing besides!
  −
| And you yourselves are also this will to power --
  −
| and nothing besides!
  −
|
  −
| (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 1067, 549-550).
  −
  −
I have attempted in a narrative form to present an accurate picture
  −
of the formalization process as it develops in practice.  Of course,
  −
accuracy must be distinguished from precision, for there are times
  −
when accuracy is better served by a vague outline that captures the
  −
manner of the subject than it is by a minute account that misses
  −
the mark entirely or catches each detail at the expense of losing
  −
the central point.  Conveying the traffic between chaos and form
  −
under the restraint of an overbearing and excisive taxonomy would
  −
have sheared away half the picture and robbed the whole exchange
  −
of the lion's share of the duty.
  −
  −
At moments I could do no better than to break into metaphor, but
  −
I believe that a certain tolerance for metaphor, especially in the
  −
initial stages of formalization, is a necessary capacity for reaching
  −
beyond the secure boundaries of what is already comfortable to reason.
  −
Plus, a controlled transport of metaphor allows one to draw on the
  −
boundless store of ready analogies and germinal morphisms that
  −
every natural language provides for free.
  −
  −
Finally, it would leave an unfair impression to delete the characters
  −
of narrative and metaphor from the text of the story, and especially
  −
after they have had such a hand in creating it.
  −
  −
Even the most precise of established formulations cannot be protected
  −
from being reused in ways that initially appear as abuses of language.
  −
  −
One of the most difficult questions about the development of intelligent
  −
systems is how the power of abstraction can arise, beginning from the
  −
kinds of formal systems where each symbol has one meaning at most.
  −
I think that the natural pathway of this evolution has to go
  −
through the obscure territory of ambiguity and metaphor.
  −
  −
A critical phase and a crucial step in the development of intelligent systems,
  −
whether biological or technological, is concerned with achieving a certain
  −
power of abstraction, but the real trick is for the budding intelligence
  −
to accomplish this without losing a grip on the material contents of
  −
the abstract categories, the labels and levels of which this power
  −
intercalates and interposes between essence and existence.
  −
  −
If one looks to the surface material of natural languages for signs of
  −
how this power of abstraction might arise, one finds a suggestive set of
  −
potential precursors in the phenomena of ambiguity, anaphora, and metaphor.
  −
Keeping this in mind throughout the project, I aim to pay close attention
  −
to the places where the power of abstraction seems to develop, especially
  −
in the guises of systematic ambiguity and controlled metaphor.
  −
  −
Paradoxically, and a bit ironically, if one's initial attempt to
  −
formalize meaning begins with the goal of stamping out ambiguity,
  −
metaphor, and all forms of figurative language use, then one may
  −
have precluded all hope of developing a capacity for abstraction
  −
at any later stage.
   
</pre>
 
</pre>
12,080

edits

Navigation menu