3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts (view source)
Revision as of 09:42, 31 January 2009
, 09:42, 31 January 2009no edit summary
== Caius ==
== Caius ==
* Caius 344/540 [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian
* Caius 344/540
**[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''.
** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''.
* Caius 434/434
* Caius 434/434
** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''.
* Caius 448/409
* Caius 448/409
** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''.
* Caius 509/386
* Caius 509/386
** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]].
* Caius 512/543
* Caius 512/543
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias''
** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''.
* Caius 611/341
* Caius 611/341
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
* Caius 612/543
* Caius 612/543
* Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''.
* Caius 668/645
** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]].
== Pembroke ==
== Pembroke ==
