Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:  
== Caius ==
 
== Caius ==
   −
* Caius 344/540 [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian
+
* Caius 344/540  
 +
**[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''.
 +
** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. 
 
* Caius 434/434
 
* Caius 434/434
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r).  For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19).  Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''.
 
* Caius 448/409
 
* Caius 448/409
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. 
 
* Caius 509/386
 
* Caius 509/386
 +
** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]].
 
* Caius 512/543  
 
* Caius 512/543  
 
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
 
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
 +
** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias''
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''.
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
* Caius 611/341
 
* Caius 611/341
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
+
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
 
* Caius 612/543
 
* Caius 612/543
* Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
+
** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''.
 +
* Caius 668/645  
 +
** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
 +
** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]].
    
== Pembroke ==
 
== Pembroke ==
3,209

edits

Navigation menu