MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
1,239 bytes added
, 09:42, 31 January 2009
Line 41: |
Line 41: |
| == Caius == | | == Caius == |
| | | |
− | * Caius 344/540 [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian | + | * Caius 344/540 |
| + | **[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''. |
| + | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. |
| * Caius 434/434 | | * Caius 434/434 |
| + | ** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. |
| * Caius 448/409 | | * Caius 448/409 |
| + | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. |
| * Caius 509/386 | | * Caius 509/386 |
| + | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. |
| * Caius 512/543 | | * Caius 512/543 |
| ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] | | ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] |
| + | ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' |
| + | ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| * Caius 611/341 | | * Caius 611/341 |
− | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. | + | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. |
| * Caius 612/543 | | * Caius 612/543 |
− | * Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian | + | ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. |
| + | * Caius 668/645 |
| + | ** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian |
| + | ** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]]. |
| | | |
| == Pembroke == | | == Pembroke == |