Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday April 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 219: Line 219:  
Figure 2 depicts the situation that we have before us.
 
Figure 2 depicts the situation that we have before us.
   −
<br><center><pre>
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 +
| align="center" |
 +
<pre>
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
|                                                                    |
 
|                                                                    |
Line 246: Line 248:  
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------------------------------------o
 
Figure 2.  Disjunctive Term u, Taken as Subject
 
Figure 2.  Disjunctive Term u, Taken as Subject
</pre></center><br>
+
</pre>
 +
|}
   −
In a similar but dual fashion to the preceding consideration, there is a gap between the the logical disjunction <math>u,\!</math> in lattice terminology, the ''least upper bound'' (''lub'') of the disjoined terms, <math>u = \operatorname{lub} ( \{ s_j : j = 1 ~\text{to}~ 4 \}),</math> and what we might regard as the ''natural disjunction'' or the ''natural lub'', namely, <math>v := \text{cloven-hoofed}.\!</math>
+
In a similar but dual fashion to the preceding consideration, there is a gap between the the logical disjunction <math>u,\!</math> in lattice terminology, the ''least upper bound'' (''lub'') of the disjoined terms, <math>u = \operatorname{lub} \{ s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4 \},</math> and what we might regard as the ''natural disjunction'' or the ''natural lub'', namely, <math>v := \text{cloven-hoofed}.\!</math>
    
Once again, the sheer implausibility of imagining that the disjunctive term <math>u\!</math> would ever be embedded exactly as such in a lattice of natural kinds, leads to the evident ''naturalness'' of the induction to <math>v \Rightarrow w,</math> namely, the rule that cloven-hoofed animals are herbivorous.
 
Once again, the sheer implausibility of imagining that the disjunctive term <math>u\!</math> would ever be embedded exactly as such in a lattice of natural kinds, leads to the evident ''naturalness'' of the induction to <math>v \Rightarrow w,</math> namely, the rule that cloven-hoofed animals are herbivorous.
12,080

edits

Navigation menu