MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday November 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
33 bytes added
, 17:50, 30 March 2009
Line 219: |
Line 219: |
| Figure 2 depicts the situation that we have before us. | | Figure 2 depicts the situation that we have before us. |
| | | |
− | <br><center><pre>
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | align="center" | |
| + | <pre> |
| o---------------------------------------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | |
Line 246: |
Line 248: |
| o---------------------------------------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o |
| Figure 2. Disjunctive Term u, Taken as Subject | | Figure 2. Disjunctive Term u, Taken as Subject |
− | </pre></center><br> | + | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | In a similar but dual fashion to the preceding consideration, there is a gap between the the logical disjunction <math>u,\!</math> in lattice terminology, the ''least upper bound'' (''lub'') of the disjoined terms, <math>u = \operatorname{lub} ( \{ s_j : j = 1 ~\text{to}~ 4 \}),</math> and what we might regard as the ''natural disjunction'' or the ''natural lub'', namely, <math>v := \text{cloven-hoofed}.\!</math> | + | In a similar but dual fashion to the preceding consideration, there is a gap between the the logical disjunction <math>u,\!</math> in lattice terminology, the ''least upper bound'' (''lub'') of the disjoined terms, <math>u = \operatorname{lub} \{ s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4 \},</math> and what we might regard as the ''natural disjunction'' or the ''natural lub'', namely, <math>v := \text{cloven-hoofed}.\!</math> |
| | | |
| Once again, the sheer implausibility of imagining that the disjunctive term <math>u\!</math> would ever be embedded exactly as such in a lattice of natural kinds, leads to the evident ''naturalness'' of the induction to <math>v \Rightarrow w,</math> namely, the rule that cloven-hoofed animals are herbivorous. | | Once again, the sheer implausibility of imagining that the disjunctive term <math>u\!</math> would ever be embedded exactly as such in a lattice of natural kinds, leads to the evident ''naturalness'' of the induction to <math>v \Rightarrow w,</math> namely, the rule that cloven-hoofed animals are herbivorous. |