Line 2,791: |
Line 2,791: |
| ===Note 7=== | | ===Note 7=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | One more piece of notation will save us a few bytes in the length of many of our schematic formulations. |
− | One more piece of notation will save us a few bytes | |
− | in the length of many of our schematic formulations. | |
| | | |
− | Let !X! = {x_1, ..., x_k} be a finite class of variables -- | + | Let <math>\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \ldots, x_k \}</math> be a finite class of variables, regarded as a formal alphabet of formal symbols but listed here without quotation marks. Starting from this initial alphabet, the following items may then be defined: |
− | whose names I list, according to the usual custom, without
| |
− | what seems to my semiotic consciousness like the necessary
| |
− | quotation marks around their particular characters, though | |
− | not without not a little trepidation, or without a worried
| |
− | cognizance that I may be obligated to reinsert them all to
| |
− | their rightful places at a subsequent stage of development --
| |
− | with regard to which we may now define the following items:
| |
| | | |
− | 1. The "(first order) differential alphabet",
| + | #<p>The "(first order) differential alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{d}\mathcal{X} = \{ \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math> |
− | | + | #<p>The "(first order) extended alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \mathcal{X} \cup \operatorname{d}\mathcal{X},</math></p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \dots, x_k, \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math></p> |
− | d!X! = {dx_1, ..., dx_k}.
| |
− | | |
− | 2. The "(first order) extended alphabet",
| |
− | | |
− | E!X! = !X! |_| d!X!,
| |
− | | |
− | E!X! = {x_1, ..., x_k, dx_1, ..., dx_k}.
| |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Before we continue with the differential analysis | | Before we continue with the differential analysis |
| of the source proposition q, we need to pause and | | of the source proposition q, we need to pause and |