MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
71 bytes added
, 04:50, 4 May 2008
Line 2,795: |
Line 2,795: |
| Let <math>\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \ldots, x_k \}</math> be a finite class of variables, regarded as a formal alphabet of formal symbols but listed here without quotation marks. Starting from this initial alphabet, the following items may then be defined: | | Let <math>\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \ldots, x_k \}</math> be a finite class of variables, regarded as a formal alphabet of formal symbols but listed here without quotation marks. Starting from this initial alphabet, the following items may then be defined: |
| | | |
− | #<p>The "(first order) differential alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{d}\mathcal{X} = \{ \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math> | + | #<p>The "(first order) differential alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{d}\mathcal{X} = \{ \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math></p> |
| #<p>The "(first order) extended alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \mathcal{X} \cup \operatorname{d}\mathcal{X},</math></p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \dots, x_k, \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math></p> | | #<p>The "(first order) extended alphabet",</p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \mathcal{X} \cup \operatorname{d}\mathcal{X},</math></p><p><math>\operatorname{E}\mathcal{X} = \{ x_1, \dots, x_k, \operatorname{d}x_1, \ldots, \operatorname{d}x_k \}.</math></p> |
| + | |
| + | Before we continue with the differential analysis of the source proposition <math>q\!</math>, we need to pause and take another look at just how it shapes up in the light of the extended universe <math>\operatorname{E}X,</math> in other words, to examine in detail its tacit extension <math>\operatorname{e}q.\!</math> |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | Before we continue with the differential analysis
| |
− | of the source proposition q, we need to pause and
| |
− | take another look at just how it shapes up in the
| |
− | light of the extended universe EX, in other words,
| |
− | to examine in utter detail its tacit extension eq.
| |
− |
| |
| The models of eq in EX can be comprehended as follows: | | The models of eq in EX can be comprehended as follows: |
| | | |