Changes

<blockquote><code>

<blockquote><code>

(( u v )( u w )( v w )).

(( u v )( u w )( v w ))

</code></blockquote>

</code></blockquote>

</pre>

</pre>

In summary, <math>\operatorname{E}q \cdot c</math> informs us that we can get from <math>c\!</math> to a model of <math>q\!</math> by changing our position with respect to <math>u, v, w\!</math> according to the following description:

In summary, Eq.c informs us that we can get from c to a model of q by

 

making the following changes in our position with respect to u, v, w,

to wit, "change none or just one among {u, v, w}".

Change none or just one among <math>\{ u, v, w \}.\!</math>

I think that it would be worth our time to diagram the models

I think that it would be worth our time to diagram the models of the ''enlarged'' or ''shifted'' proposition, <math>\operatorname{E}q,</math> at least, the selection of them that we find issuing from the center cell <math>c.\!</math>

of the "enlarged" or "shifted" proposition, Eq, at least, the

selection of them that we find issuing from the center cell c.

Figure 4 is an extended venn diagram for the proposition Eq.c,

Figure&nbsp;4 is an extended venn diagram for the proposition <math>\operatorname{E}q \cdot c,</math> where the shaded area gives the models of <math>q\!</math> and the "<code>@</code>" signs mark the terminal points of the requisite feature alterations.

where the shaded area gives the models of q and the "@" signs

mark the terminal points of the requisite feature alterations.

o-------------------------------------------------o

o-------------------------------------------------o

| X                                              |

| X                                              |