Search results

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 01, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...nt from "truth" for me (and that the relevant facts don't matter). This is relativism.
    33 KB (4,907 words) - 04:32, 22 September 2014
  • * [[Richard Rorty|Rorty, Richard]] (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Press, * [[Richard J. Bernstein|Bernstein, Richard J.]], ''Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis'', University of Pennsylvania Press, Ph
    61 KB (7,563 words) - 18:26, 15 June 2010
  • * [[Richard Rorty|Rorty, Richard]] (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Press, * [[Richard J. Bernstein|Bernstein, Richard J.]], ''Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis'', University of Pennsylvania Press, Ph
    61 KB (7,562 words) - 18:18, 18 March 2008
  • * [[Richard Rorty|Rorty, Richard]] (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Press, * [[Relativism]]
    81 KB (11,851 words) - 22:22, 25 January 2008
  • * [[Richard Rorty|Rorty, Richard]] (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Press, * [[Relativism]]
    81 KB (11,851 words) - 18:53, 20 August 2007
  • "A correspondence theory of truth represents a rejection of any sort of relativism about truth that extends further than the dyadic relation of interest, main
    33 KB (4,956 words) - 22:18, 25 January 2008
  • * [[Richard Rorty|Rorty, Richard]] (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Pr
    23 KB (3,340 words) - 13:12, 16 September 2010
  • * Rorty, R. (1991), ''Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth : Philosophical Papers, Volume 1'', Cambridge University Press,
    37 KB (5,460 words) - 14:45, 17 November 2015
  • ...but instead a post-modernist worldview with its associated epistemological relativism, eclecticism and the zealotry about not "privileging" one view above anothe ...ce". If Grinder can define his own terms of evidence -- if epistemological relativism is a valid philosophical position -- then you question is illegitimate and
    209 KB (33,239 words) - 17:04, 25 September 2008
  • ...ls that what is true varies across cultures and eras. For example, [[moral relativism]] is the view that moral expectations are socially determined.
    237 KB (37,371 words) - 11:22, 20 August 2007
  • ...ls that what is true varies across cultures and eras. For example, [[moral relativism]] is the view that moral expectations are socially determined.
    237 KB (37,371 words) - 22:14, 25 January 2008
  • 11:30 < Pharos> no room for moral relativism there
    205 KB (28,846 words) - 00:08, 24 January 2015
  • [11:33] <Pharos> no room for moral relativism there
    1.63 MB (214,268 words) - 16:57, 8 February 2015