Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia scandals"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(Fuzzy Zoeller incident)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
That's a great chart! It would be cool if a major media property elected to use it.
 
That's a great chart! It would be cool if a major media property elected to use it.
 +
 +
== Fuzzy Zoeller incident ==
 +
 +
Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia.  Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too.  For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 15:57, 19 March 2007

That's a great chart! It would be cool if a major media property elected to use it.

Fuzzy Zoeller incident

Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia. Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too. For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --MyWikiBiz 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT)