Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Caius) |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== Caius == | == Caius == | ||
− | * Caius 344/540 [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian | + | * Caius 344/540 |
+ | **[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''. | ||
+ | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. | ||
* Caius 434/434 | * Caius 434/434 | ||
+ | ** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. | ||
* Caius 448/409 | * Caius 448/409 | ||
+ | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. | ||
* Caius 509/386 | * Caius 509/386 | ||
+ | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. | ||
* Caius 512/543 | * Caius 512/543 | ||
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] | ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] | ||
+ | ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' | ||
+ | ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
* Caius 611/341 | * Caius 611/341 | ||
− | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. | + | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. |
* Caius 612/543 | * Caius 612/543 | ||
− | * Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian | + | ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. |
+ | * Caius 668/645 | ||
+ | ** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian | ||
+ | ** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]]. | ||
== Pembroke == | == Pembroke == |
Revision as of 09:42, 31 January 2009
Corpus Christi
- 119 Robert Kilwardby In Prisc. Min.
Bodleian
- Auct F. 5 23
- Canon Lat. 278
- Canon misc. 278
- Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
- commentary on Isagoge
- commentary on Perihermenias
- commentary on Praedicamenta.
- Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
- Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
- Digby 204 - Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices, Thomas Aquinas (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by Giles of Rome.
- Lat misc. e 108
Corpus Christi
- Corpus Christi 119
- Corpus Christi 250
- Corpus Christi 293b
Merton
- Merton 289
- Merton 292: Simon of Faversham - Perihermenias.
- Merton 296
New College
- New College 285
Peterhouse
- Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
- Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
- Peterhouse 206: In Perihermenias
Caius
- Caius 344/540
- William de Bonkes, Questions on Priscian, questions on the Perihermenias.
- John de Stycborn, Questions on the Praedicamenta, questions on the Perihermenias.
- Caius 434/434
- Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
- Caius 448/409
- Walter Burley, Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum.
- Caius 509/386
- Commentary on Perihermenias tentatively ascribed to John de Seccheville.
- Caius 512/543
- Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
- William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
- Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
- Caius 611/341
- Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
- Caius 612/543
- John of Felmingham, questions on the Elenchi.
- Caius 668/645
- Thomas Cherminstre, Questions on Priscian
- William de Duffelde, probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the Analytica Posteriora]].
Pembroke
- Pembroke 193
Cambridge University Library
- Kk3
Notes
- ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)