Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
== Caius ==
 
== Caius ==
  
* Caius 344/540 [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian
+
* Caius 344/540  
 +
**[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''.
 +
** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. 
 
* Caius 434/434
 
* Caius 434/434
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r).  For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19).  Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''.
 
* Caius 448/409
 
* Caius 448/409
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. 
 
* Caius 509/386
 
* Caius 509/386
 +
** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]].
 
* Caius 512/543  
 
* Caius 512/543  
 
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
 
** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
 +
** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias''
 +
** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''.
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
* Caius 611/341
 
* Caius 611/341
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
+
** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
 
* Caius 612/543
 
* Caius 612/543
* Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
+
** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''.
 +
* Caius 668/645  
 +
** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian
 +
** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]].
  
 
== Pembroke ==
 
== Pembroke ==

Revision as of 09:42, 31 January 2009

Corpus Christi

Bodleian

  • Auct F. 5 23
  • Canon Lat. 278
  • Canon misc. 278
  • Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
    • commentary on Isagoge
    • commentary on Perihermenias
    • commentary on Praedicamenta.
  • Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
  • Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
  • Digby 204 - Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices, Thomas Aquinas (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by Giles of Rome.
  • Lat misc. e 108

Corpus Christi

  • Corpus Christi 119
  • Corpus Christi 250
  • Corpus Christi 293b

Merton

New College

  • New College 285

Peterhouse

  • Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
  • Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
  • Peterhouse 206: In Perihermenias

Caius

  • Caius 344/540
  • Caius 434/434
    • Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
  • Caius 448/409
  • Caius 509/386
  • Caius 512/543
    • Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
    • William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
    • Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.



  • Caius 611/341
    • Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
  • Caius 612/543
  • Caius 668/645

Pembroke

  • Pembroke 193

Cambridge University Library

  • Kk3

Notes

  1. ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)