Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Caius) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum. | * Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum. | ||
* Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]]. | * Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]]. | ||
− | * Digby 204 - [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices'', [[Aquinas]] (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by [[Giles of Rome]]. | + | * Digby 204 - [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices'', [[Thomas Aquinas]] (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by [[Giles of Rome]]. |
* Lat misc. e 108 | * Lat misc. e 108 | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 26 January 2009
Corpus Christi
- 119 Robert Kilwardby In Prisc. Min.
Bodleian
- Auct F. 5 23
- Canon Lat. 278
- Canon misc. 278
- Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
- commentary on Isagoge
- commentary on Perihermenias
- commentary on Praedicamenta.
- Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
- Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
- Digby 204 - Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices, Thomas Aquinas (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by Giles of Rome.
- Lat misc. e 108
Corpus Christi
- Corpus Christi 119
- Corpus Christi 250
- Corpus Christi 293b
Merton
- Merton 289
- Merton 292: Simon of Faversham - Perihermenias.
- Merton 296
New College
- New College 285
Peterhouse
- Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
- Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
- Peterhouse 206: In Perihermenias
Caius
- Caius 344/540 William de Bonkes, Questions on Priscian
- Caius 434/434
- Caius 448/409
- Caius 509/386
- Caius 512/543
- Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
- Caius 611/341
- Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Stan Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
- Caius 612/543
- Caius 668/645 Thomas Cherminstre, Questions on Priscian
Pembroke
- Pembroke 193
Cambridge University Library
- Kk3
Notes
- ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)