| Line 363: |
Line 363: |
| | | | |
| | </ol></ol> | | </ol></ol> |
| | + | |
| | + | '''NB.''' The notation in this next section needs fixing. |
| | | | |
| | The definitions of these syntactic operations can now be organized in a slightly better fashion, for both conceptual and computational purposes, by making a few additional conventions and auxiliary definitions. | | The definitions of these syntactic operations can now be organized in a slightly better fashion, for both conceptual and computational purposes, by making a few additional conventions and auxiliary definitions. |
| Line 429: |
Line 431: |
| | </ol></ol></ol> | | </ol></ol></ol> |
| | | | |
| − | <pre>
| + | Notice that the expressions <math>\operatorname{Conc}^0_j s_j</math> and <math>\operatorname{Surc}^0_j s_j</math> are defined in such a way that the respective operators |
| − | Notice that the expressions Conc^0_j z_j and Surc^0_j z_j | + | <math>\operatorname{Conc}^0</math> and <math>\operatorname{Surc}^0</math> basically "ignore", in the manner of constants, whatever sequences of strings <math>s_j\!</math> may be listed as their ostensible arguments. |
| − | are defined in such a way that the respective operators | |
| − | Conc^0 and Surc^0 basically "ignore", in the manner of | |
| − | constants, whatever sequences of strings z_j may be | |
| − | listed as their ostensible arguments. | |
| | | | |
| − | Having defined the basic operations of concatenation and surcatenation | + | Having defined the basic operations of concatenation and surcatenation on arbitrary strings, in effect, giving them operational meaning for the all-inclusive language <math>\mathfrak{L} = \mathfrak{A}^*,</math> it is time to adjoin the notion of a more discriminating grammaticality, in other words, a more properly restrictive concept of a sentence. |
| − | on arbitrary strings, in effect, giving them operational meaning for | |
| − | the all-inclusive language !L! = !A!*, it is time to adjoin the | |
| − | notion of a more discriminating grammaticality, in other words, | |
| − | a more properly restrictive concept of a sentence. | |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | If !L! is an arbitrary formal language over an alphabet of the sort that | | If !L! is an arbitrary formal language over an alphabet of the sort that |
| | we are talking about, that is, an alphabet of the form !A! = !M! |_| !P!, | | we are talking about, that is, an alphabet of the form !A! = !M! |_| !P!, |