Difference between revisions of "User talk:MyWikiBiz"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Bug reporting: oops, gotta get used to this new signature)
(→‎Wikipediocracy: For the screechers)
 
(471 intermediate revisions by 53 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Past discussion is archived here''': <br>
+
'''Past discussions are archived here''':
[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]] ''(Oct 2006 - Mar 2007)''
 
  
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 1|Archive 1]] ''(Oct 2006 - Mar 2007)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 2|Archive 2]] ''(Mar 2007 - May 2007)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 3|Archive 3]] ''(June 2007 - June 2008)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 4|Archive 4]] ''(July 2008 - January 2009)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 5|Archive 5]] ''(January 2009 - December 2009)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 6|Archive 6]] ''(February 2010 - April 2016)''
  
----
 
  
==Adbrite==
+
== Math Biz ==
adbrite looks much more on the up and up and doesn't have pop-ups. [http://www.adbrite.com] Why google why! - this looks to be a suitable replacement and better than the last one.
 
  
I'm also only putting the ads on my business's for now because I too would hate 80/20 ad to content ratio. [[User:Garrett|Garrett]] 19:08, 9 April 2007 (PDT)
+
Hi Greg,
  
Ad conclusion -
+
Do you think there's any chance you'll be updating the math parser, whatever it is, any time soon?  I'd like to keep MyWikiBiz as my main work wiki and I've been trying to fix all the problems with MathJax or whatever it is, but it just doesn't look doable anymore.  Here's how one of my math sections looks on three different wikis:
  
I've worked kanoodle so it doesn't spam or pop-up and am putting their banner ads on all my non-business property -
+
* MyWikiBiz
 +
: http://mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  
For my business's I'm going with adbrite because they allow individual advertisers to bid exclusively for a flat rate and other cool features. [[User:Garrett|Garrett]] 15:38, 10 April 2007 (PDT)
+
* InterSciWiki
 +
: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  
== Bug reporting ==
+
* Wikiversity
 +
: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:JonAwbrey/Sandbox
  
I don't know who to contact - I suppose you're the most appropriate person I know! I found a bug already. It seems like the E-mail attribute is not designed to cope with URLs, just e-mail addresses (unless it's designed that way, of course). I just choose not to give a direct e-mail address [for obvious reasons] and still allow people to contact me with a web form). [[User:Nathan|Nathan Richards]] ([[User talk:Nathan|talk]]) 22:37, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
+
Aside from the overall readability issues, there's problems with underlining and failure to distinguish serif and sans serif characters that I use for a critical math distinction.
:Nathan, I believe you're refering to the Personal Infobox element for "Email", which I do believe is set up to "point" to a traditional person@domainname.com type of addressThere are some e-mail contact form widgets, though, that other users are embeddingThat might be of interest to you. Check out [http://www.centiare.com/Directory_talk:Lawyer_Central/Bankruptcy this page template] that Garrett Minks designed. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 08:47, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
+
 
::Yes, that's what I meant. Your suggestion sort-of works. I'll keep it in mind, thanks :) —&nbsp;[[User:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''Nathan'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''talk'''</span>]])</sup> <sub>/ <em>00:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)</em></sub>
+
Regards, [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] ([[User talk:Jon Awbrey|talk]]) 22:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:Frankly, there is zero chance that I would personally update the math parser, because I'm not technically inclined.  The last time we had a major overhaul to the platform was in 2014.  That took an outside contractor to execute, and the cost was around $900.  I am just guessing that a math parser update would potentially set off a domino effect of requiring an update to the Mediawiki root platform, and thus I could be "in" for another $1,000-ish cost. Your most popular page, '''Logical graph''', got 62 hits from around the globe in the past monthFor 2 hits a day, I really can't justify the potential budget outlayIs there any way you would commit to splitting the cost and working with me to find an appropriate contractor? - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 16:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Wikipediocracy ==
 +
 
 +
Hey dude what's up?  Did you quit Wikipediocracy? [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] ([[User talk:Emperor|talk]]) 20:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:Hey bro what's hangin?  No, I still read it regularly and talk with numerous members at great length! [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 14:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:52, 3 February 2018

Past discussions are archived here:


Math Biz

Hi Greg,

Do you think there's any chance you'll be updating the math parser, whatever it is, any time soon? I'd like to keep MyWikiBiz as my main work wiki and I've been trying to fix all the problems with MathJax or whatever it is, but it just doesn't look doable anymore. Here's how one of my math sections looks on three different wikis:

  • MyWikiBiz
http://mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  • InterSciWiki
http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  • Wikiversity
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:JonAwbrey/Sandbox

Aside from the overall readability issues, there's problems with underlining and failure to distinguish serif and sans serif characters that I use for a critical math distinction.

Regards, Jon Awbrey (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Frankly, there is zero chance that I would personally update the math parser, because I'm not technically inclined. The last time we had a major overhaul to the platform was in 2014. That took an outside contractor to execute, and the cost was around $900. I am just guessing that a math parser update would potentially set off a domino effect of requiring an update to the Mediawiki root platform, and thus I could be "in" for another $1,000-ish cost. Your most popular page, Logical graph, got 62 hits from around the globe in the past month. For 2 hits a day, I really can't justify the potential budget outlay. Is there any way you would commit to splitting the cost and working with me to find an appropriate contractor? - MyWikiBiz (talk) 16:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipediocracy

Hey dude what's up? Did you quit Wikipediocracy? Emperor (talk) 20:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey bro what's hangin? No, I still read it regularly and talk with numerous members at great length! MyWikiBiz (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)