Difference between revisions of "User talk:MyWikiBiz"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Wikipediocracy: For the screechers)
 
(128 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 4|Archive 4]] ''(July 2008 - January 2009)''
 
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 4|Archive 4]] ''(July 2008 - January 2009)''
 
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 5|Archive 5]] ''(January 2009 - December 2009)''
 
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 5|Archive 5]] ''(January 2009 - December 2009)''
 +
*[[User talk:MyWikiBiz/Archive 6|Archive 6]] ''(February 2010 - April 2016)''
  
==Aricle not doing well in google==
 
  
this article [[Sarey Savy]] is number 15 on google i need to make it number one! Help! please?! ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 21:06, 11 February 2010 (PST))
+
== Math Biz ==
: You just created it.  It may take some time to get to #1.  Also, it will help if you go to other websites (Facebook, MySpace, Wikia, etc.) and try to get an external link placed FROM there TO this article here.  I will look at the [[Sarey Savy]] page and see if I can help matters with the semantic tagging in the article. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 06:00, 12 February 2010 (PST)
 
  
Thanks man this is WAY better than Wikipedia =] If i could give away awards for best wikis i would give you millions and you'd win all the time =] ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 08:42, 12 February 2010 (PST))
+
Hi Greg,
  
Oh it's decreasing it's rank on google. ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 09:08, 12 February 2010 (PST))
+
Do you think there's any chance you'll be updating the math parser, whatever it is, any time soon?  I'd like to keep MyWikiBiz as my main work wiki and I've been trying to fix all the problems with MathJax or whatever it is, but it just doesn't look doable anymore.  Here's how one of my math sections looks on three different wikis:
  
Why is it decreasing? ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 09:47, 12 February 2010 (PST))
+
* MyWikiBiz
 +
: http://mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  
:It probably senses your panic. Seriously, calm down -- these things take time. And there's no saying that this page is going to go to #1 -- there's already a page on MySpace and on Facebook. They tend to perform stronger than MyWikiBiz. Have you set up any inbound, "dofollow" links on other sites? -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 12:52, 12 February 2010 (PST)
+
* InterSciWiki
 +
: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  
Yes it is linked on myspace facebook etc. ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 14:03, 12 February 2010 (PST))
+
* Wikiversity
 +
: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:JonAwbrey/Sandbox
  
What can i do to improve the google ranking? ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 21:40, 12 February 2010 (PST))
+
Aside from the overall readability issues, there's problems with underlining and failure to distinguish serif and sans serif characters that I use for a critical math distinction.
  
:Mr. Chen, may I ask how old are you?  Please [http://www.slideshare.net/bencrothers/10-tips-to-boost-your-google-ranking read this] and follow what you learn there.  These are basic tips for boosting the Google ranking of a site or page you wish to optimize.  Good luck! -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 06:51, 13 February 2010 (PST)
+
Regards, [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] ([[User talk:Jon Awbrey|talk]]) 22:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  
Thanks! It's number 3 on google ranking! Can't you take the Directory talk out? ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 10:37, 13 February 2010 (PST))
+
:Frankly, there is zero chance that I would personally update the math parser, because I'm not technically inclined.  The last time we had a major overhaul to the platform was in 2014.  That took an outside contractor to execute, and the cost was around $900.  I am just guessing that a math parser update would potentially set off a domino effect of requiring an update to the Mediawiki root platform, and thus I could be "in" for another $1,000-ish cost.  Your most popular page, '''Logical graph''', got 62 hits from around the globe in the past month.  For 2 hits a day, I really can't justify the potential budget outlay.  Is there any way you would commit to splitting the cost and working with me to find an appropriate contractor? - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 16:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
  
Okay it fell down it's not even on google!!! I just deleted my history and everything then the next thing you know Sarey Savy-Mywikibiz is GONE! ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 16:01, 14 February 2010 (PST))
+
== Wikipediocracy ==
  
The directory doesn't show up but, yet when i take the directory out it does at number 3. ([[User:Michael Chen|Michael Chen]] 09:39, 15 February 2010 (PST))
+
Hey dude what's up?  Did you quit Wikipediocracy? [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] ([[User talk:Emperor|talk]]) 20:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
  
== Problems With SVG Images ==
+
:Hey bro what's hanginNo, I still read it regularly and talk with numerous members at great length! [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 14:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 
 
Hi, Greg, there's some kind of problem with SVG images.  Maybe we're a couple of MediaWiki updates behind?
 
 
 
* Here's my test page: http://mywikibiz.com/User:Jon_Awbrey/SVG
 
 
 
* Here's what it should look like: http://oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/SVG
 
 
 
[[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 10:50, 16 February 2010 (PST)
 
 
 
:We will look into it and [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Image_Administration#SVG seek a repair]. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:42, 16 February 2010 (PST)
 
 
 
==Can you please explain to me what your site is for?==
 
I don't want to break any rules here. I really don't want to be banned from here. They banned me at wikipedia review and it just hurt my feelings even more. I would like to help out here, but I don't want any more bans because it makes me feel bad. I guess I have a very big problem with following or understanding site rules, so if you could please help me out with what you expect here and what this is for - before I do anything wrong and get banned I would appreciate it.[[User:Wiki Greek Basketball|Wiki Greek Basketball]] 12:45, 19 February 2010 (PST)
 
:[http://www.mywikibiz.com/Help:Introduction This page] should answer most of your questions. I'm happy that you're here.  Not looking to ban you.  In fact, three of the four top contributors to MyWikiBiz.com are blocked on Wikipedia.  You basically have a lot of options here, but the first thing you need to square away is whether you are going to try to make a little bit of money here (more effort and slightly more rules to obey), or whether money is not of interest to you (easier, and fewer rules to stay on top of). -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 17:10, 19 February 2010 (PST)
 
 
 
== Wikia ==
 
 
 
Do you suppose Wikia would be profitable by now, or ever if Wikipedia did not tag Wikia links with the "nofollow" tag for however long? Do you know for how long they were not tagged with "nofollow"?
 
 
 
I saw that you posted this link, I think on WR:
 
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=5000&offset=20000&target=http://*.wikia.com
 
 
 
So there are like 22,000 Wikia links? Wow. [[User:Wikademia|Wikademia]]
 
 
 
:Considering that Wikia is only barely profitable at this time (and with $14 million sunk into it, and likely very little of that recuperated), I would honestly suggest that Wikia would not be profitable by now if they hadn't had the early and ongoing boost(s) from Wikipedia-based link relevance and traffic.  If you add to this how often Jimmy Wales has traveled on purportedly a Wikimedia Foundation "mission", but manages to talk about Wikia even briefly to large audiences, then I am absolutely certain Wikia would be well underwater without that self-promotional boost. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 09:18, 18 March 2010 (PDT)
 
 
 
:: But it is probably legal to do things like that I suppose? I am not a lawyer. I have no idea. [[User:Wikademia|Wikademia]]
 
 
 
::: Oh, I'm sure it's legal... up until the point the IRS decides to conduct an audit of either your personal or your corporation's taxes.  But, regardless; the real point is when you consider how Wales speaks so glowingly of his free (and freewill) contributions to the Wikimedia Foundation mission (with no mention of how he's appropriated that mission to almost entirely drive his personal fortunes), his character is revealed to be that of a hypocrite when he speaks with revulsion about those who would "exploit" Wikipedia for profit. You're smart enough to see through that phony baloney, right? -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 14:15, 18 March 2010 (PDT)
 
:::: Self deception maybe? Or maybe just the way capitalism has to work? [[User:Wikademia|Wikademia]]
 
 
 
== Wikademia and Wikieducator ==
 
 
 
I'm sure you'd be welcome to edit on both of those. [[User:Wikademia|Wikademia]]
 
 
 
:Have you seen the Alexa ratings of WikiEducator?  They are a bit lower than MyWikiBiz.  I'd reach more people working here.  As for Wikademia, let me know when it reaches the top million on Alexa. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 21:50, 21 March 2010 (PDT)
 
 
 
 
 
== Hi MyWikiBiz ==
 
 
 
I would like to edit the article 'Greg James Sculpture Studio Gallery' but it appears to be locked. The article was created by Peter Z. who doesn't seem to have any problems in editing it. My menu bar displays on the article 'View Source'. Can you please help? [[User:Greg James Sculpture|Greg James Sculpture]] 21:11, 31 March 2010 (PDT)
 
:It is open now to your being able to edit it.  However, be advised, once you make an edit, you will become the "owner" of the article (because it's in Directory space), and others (including Peter) will not have access to edit.  That's how our Directory space is set up at MyWikiBiz -- it's intended to be one-editor-only. If the two of you are both equally interested in editing it, I would suggest creating a joint account between you and share the password. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 21:30, 31 March 2010 (PDT)
 
:: Thank you [[User:Greg James Sculpture|Greg James Sculpture]] 21:47, 31 March 2010 (PDT)
 
 
 
== Title Help ==
 
Hi MyWikiBiz! Could you please help me. I've created a new article & left a dot at the end of the title: [[Directory:Robert Dawkins-The Silver Gallery.]] Is their a way of removing the dot, because I can't figure out how to do it? Regards:) [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:34, 7 April 2010 (PDT)
 
: I have moved it to [[Directory:Robert_Dawkins-The_Silver_Gallery|a new location]], sans period. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 04:55, 8 April 2010 (PDT)
 
:: Thanks. [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 05:38, 8 April 2010 (PDT)
 
 
 
== Help:SMW ==
 
 
 
There is a note on one of my pages which says that ASK is no longer supported but to use 'SMW'.  Is there any documentation on this pls?  (Couldn't find any).  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 19:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
[edit] Does [http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Inline_queries this] have anything to do with it?  If I can figure this out I will add some help files.  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 19:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
:Yes, that is exactly the page I was going to point you to, Ockham.  This was one of the most frustrating aspects of our transfer to a new server host and a complete upgrade/update to both the most current Mediawiki core software, but also the most current Semantic Mediawiki extension that used to run all of our Attributes and Relations.  Now, both Attributes and Relations are lumped into a new field called "Properties".  And instead of using a := for Attributes, all Properties now need a :: instruction.  I'm going to be hiring a coder to try to make some of these universal, global changes to try to make things a bit more polished around here. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 02:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:: Hi thanks.  I [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=List_of_medieval_philosophers&oldid=116947 tested] the medieval philosophers query with the SMW syntax but still doesn't work.  I think it needs a professional to set us on the right road and then we can take it from there.  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 07:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
[edit] ah my mistake.  It does work (see [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=List_of_medieval_philosophers this version] of the page). [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 07:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
{edit] The key is to remember that it doesn't support the '=<' sign.  '<' in SMW means 'less or equal to'.  Otherwise you get the bug. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 07:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
===How about this===
 
 
 
I think SMW is going to be more powerful than ASK.  I have created a new version of [[List_of_Scholastic_Texts]], which as you can see now supports links to the authors, which the old version never did. 
 
 
 
I am going to experiment with catalogues of medieval manuscripts.  I have a digitised version of M.R.James catologue of manuscripts held in Gonville and Caius' library.  This has details of condition, production date or century, lists of Authors and so on.  There are currently projects to take catalogues like these and use professional software developers in the old-fahshioned and expensive way, to build large and difficult-to-maintain databases that only professional developers (rather than users) can understand.  Using environments like this, you hardly need developers.  A team of users and experts working together can quickly build a database that is far easier to use and far more transparent than any expensive database developed in the traditional IT-led way.
 
 
 
The problem is to get the users (i.e. medievalists or whoever) to understand how powerful this can be, and how easy to use.  I will make some experiments with the James catalogue and if this works I will publish something in 'Digital Medievalist'. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 08:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
:I agree that while this was a painful upgrade, the opportunities for even better uses of the Semantic architecture are worth it.  I am very, very pleased (you don't know how much) that a "regular user" figured this out and will be setting an example for others.  I'm going to be hiring the coder later today or tomorrow, and I hope that he'll do quite a lot to help "clean up" the old messes left behind by the upgrade. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 16:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
::Thanks, it's no problem.  I also succeeded in setting up [[List_of_medieval_manuscripts]] as mentioned above.  This points to pages like [[Directory:Logic_Museum/Caius_344/540]] which are a much better way of structuring information than in the old [[Directory:Logic_Museum/Manuscripts]], which is the old Wikipedia-style of hard-coding a list of things that cannot be sorted or filtered or categorised.  If I have time I will write a little 1-2-3 tutorial that will take someone used to the old ways and show them the new way.  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 17:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 14:52, 3 February 2018

Past discussions are archived here:


Math Biz

Hi Greg,

Do you think there's any chance you'll be updating the math parser, whatever it is, any time soon? I'd like to keep MyWikiBiz as my main work wiki and I've been trying to fix all the problems with MathJax or whatever it is, but it just doesn't look doable anymore. Here's how one of my math sections looks on three different wikis:

  • MyWikiBiz
http://mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  • InterSciWiki
http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Terminological_Interlude
  • Wikiversity
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:JonAwbrey/Sandbox

Aside from the overall readability issues, there's problems with underlining and failure to distinguish serif and sans serif characters that I use for a critical math distinction.

Regards, Jon Awbrey (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Frankly, there is zero chance that I would personally update the math parser, because I'm not technically inclined. The last time we had a major overhaul to the platform was in 2014. That took an outside contractor to execute, and the cost was around $900. I am just guessing that a math parser update would potentially set off a domino effect of requiring an update to the Mediawiki root platform, and thus I could be "in" for another $1,000-ish cost. Your most popular page, Logical graph, got 62 hits from around the globe in the past month. For 2 hits a day, I really can't justify the potential budget outlay. Is there any way you would commit to splitting the cost and working with me to find an appropriate contractor? - MyWikiBiz (talk) 16:50, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipediocracy

Hey dude what's up? Did you quit Wikipediocracy? Emperor (talk) 20:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey bro what's hangin? No, I still read it regularly and talk with numerous members at great length! MyWikiBiz (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)