Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday September 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 576: Line 576:     
==Note 12==
 
==Note 12==
 +
 +
On first examination of our present example we made a likely guess at a form of rule that
 +
would account for the finite protocol of states that we observed the system <math>X\!</math> passing through, as spied in the light of its boolean state variable <math>x : X \to \mathbb{B},</math> and that rule is well-formulated in any of these styles of notation:
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
Way back in DATA Note 3, we guessed, or "abduced",
  −
as a line of logicians from Aristotle to Peirce
  −
and beyond would say, the form of a rule that
  −
adequately accounts for the finite protocol
  −
of states that we observed the system X
  −
pass through, as spied in the light of
  −
its boolean state variable x : X -> B,
  −
and that rule is well-formulated in
  −
any of these styles of notation:
  −
   
1.1.  f : B -> B such that f : x ~> (x)
 
1.1.  f : B -> B such that f : x ~> (x)
  
12,089

edits

Navigation menu