Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts

Corpus Christi

• 119 Robert Kilwardby In Prisc. Min.

Bodleian

• Auct F. 5 23
• Canon Lat. 278
• Canon misc. 278
• Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
  • commentary on Isagoge
  • commentary on Perihermenias
  • commentary on Praedicamenta.
• Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
• Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
• Digby 204
  • Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices
  • A work by Thomas Aquinas (?)
  • Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, possibly influenced by Giles of Rome.
• Lat misc. e 108

Corpus Christi

• Corpus Christi 119
• Corpus Christi 250
• Corpus Christi 293b

Merton

• Merton 289
• Merton 292: Simon of Faversham - Perihermenias.
• Merton 296

New College

• New College 285

Peterhouse

• Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8.
• Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
• Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
• Peterhouse 206
  • Robert Kilwardby, questions on the Perihermenias.

Caius

• Caius 344/540
  • William de Bonkes, Questions on Priscian, questions on the Perihermenias.
  • John de Stycborn, Questions on the Praedicamenta, questions on the Perihermenias.
• Caius 434/434
  • Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
• Caius 448/409
  • Walter Burley, Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum.
• Caius 509/386
  • Commentary on Perihermenias tentatively ascribed to John de Seccheville.
• Caius 512/543
  • Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
  • William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
  • Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
• Caius 611/341
  • Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
• Caius 612/543
  • John of Felmingham, questions on the Elenchi.
• Caius 668/645
  • Thomas Cherminstre, Questions on Priscian
  • William de Duffelde, probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the Analytica Posteriora.

Pembroke

• Pembroke 193

Cambridge University Library

• Kk3

Worcester Cathedral Library

• Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270
  • Roger Bacon Summa grammatica (cf Peterhouse 191).
  • Anon, commentary on Analytica Priora.
  • Peter of Cornwall, two sophismata.
  • Questions on the Physica
  • sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti - included in a group of sophismata some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290

References

• A.G. Little & F. Pelster, Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302 Oxford 1934
• Lewry, P.O. (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
• Ebbesen, Sten, 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by Peter of Cornwall, Richard of Clive, Simon of Faversham and Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 55, Copenhague.