Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"

Revision as of 19:42, 26 January 2009

Auct F. 5 23
Canon Lat. 278
Canon misc. 278
Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
- commentary on Isagoge
- commentary on Perihermenias
- commentary on Praedicamenta.
Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
Digby 204 - Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices, Aquinas (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by Giles of Rome.
Lat misc. e 108

Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
Peterhouse 206: In Perihermenias

Caius 344/540 William de Bonkes, Questions on Priscian
Caius 434/434
Caius 448/409
Caius 509/386
Caius 512/543
- Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
Caius 611/341
- Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Stan Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'^[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
Caius 612/543
Caius 668/645 Thomas Cherminstre, Questions on Priscian

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]]
 * Caius 611/341
-** Questions Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Stan Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
+** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Stan Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>.  As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote.  So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308.
 * Caius 612/543
 * Caius 668/645 [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian