Changes

422 bytes added ,  17:14, 2 January 2009
Line 150: Line 150:  
Is the article better now? [[User:Jonas Rand|Jonas Rand]] 08:59, 2 January 2009 (PST)
 
Is the article better now? [[User:Jonas Rand|Jonas Rand]] 08:59, 2 January 2009 (PST)
 
:Of course it's better; but I still think that the sources you've chosen are not mainstream or necessarily vetted by independent authorities.  I'm not going to bird-dog the article.  My role here is not as "constitutional monarch" like Jimbo claims.  It's more like "benevolent dictator".  The content doesn't bother me personally, but if it leads to legal or other problems for me personally, out the window it goes.  I wish you well.  Do good things.  Make a bit of money from AdSense, if you can. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 09:07, 2 January 2009 (PST)
 
:Of course it's better; but I still think that the sources you've chosen are not mainstream or necessarily vetted by independent authorities.  I'm not going to bird-dog the article.  My role here is not as "constitutional monarch" like Jimbo claims.  It's more like "benevolent dictator".  The content doesn't bother me personally, but if it leads to legal or other problems for me personally, out the window it goes.  I wish you well.  Do good things.  Make a bit of money from AdSense, if you can. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 09:07, 2 January 2009 (PST)
 +
 +
I cited an official court document, CounterPunch (which is quite a popular news source), and a book. I don't see what is not independent about anything other than the court document.
 +
 +
I'd like someone to transfer these articles to Wikipedia. I'm not so interested in the AdSense thing.
 +
 +
Also, is there something else that I should cite with independent sources? [[User:Jonas Rand|Jonas Rand]] 09:14, 2 January 2009 (PST)
78

edits