MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
129 bytes added
, 14:27, 8 November 2009
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| It is one of a series of translations and discussions to do with the question of whether a <i>per se</i> proposition (one whose predicate is included in the subject, | | It is one of a series of translations and discussions to do with the question of whether a <i>per se</i> proposition (one whose predicate is included in the subject, |
| such as 'every man is an animal') is true when the subject does not exist. | | such as 'every man is an animal') is true when the subject does not exist. |
− | Other texts from the late thirteenth century which include work by Duns Scotus (<b>link to follow</b>), <a href="sigerquaestio22.htm">Siger of Brabant, | + | Other texts from the late thirteenth century which include work by Duns Scotus (<b>link to follow</b>), [[Directory:Logic Museum/Siger of Brabant/Quaestiones in Metaphysicam 20-21|Siger of Brabant]], [[Directory:Logic Museum/Simon of Faversham/On Sophistical Refutations|Simon of Faversham]], [[Directory:Logic Museum/Radulphus Brito/Quaestiones super Artem veterem|Radulphus Brito]] and others. |
− | <a href="simonfavnullohomine.htm">Simon of Faversham, <a href="brito-quaestiones.htm">Radulphus Brito and others.
| |
| | | |
| Two of the four questions are included here. [[#I|Question I]] is whether Every man is 'of necessity' an animal. | | Two of the four questions are included here. [[#I|Question I]] is whether Every man is 'of necessity' an animal. |