7,909
edits
Changes
→Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard
:Hi Ockham. Hmmm! I 'm finding the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard approach to these issues to be be quite odd. It's taken on a darker tone. They (the Admin) have not responded at all. No encyclopedia should remain quite on these matters (this is media material). This just '''dosen't''' make any sense. Cheers [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 18:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)
:Hi Ockham. Hmmm! I 'm finding the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard approach to these issues to be be quite odd. It's taken on a darker tone. They (the Admin) have not responded at all. No encyclopedia should remain quite on these matters (this is media material). This just '''dosen't''' make any sense. Cheers [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 18:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)
:: It's the editor called DIREKTOR who is the problem, isn't it?[[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 01:20, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
:: It's the editor called DIREKTOR who is the problem, isn't it?[[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 01:20, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
::: Yes, he is part of the problem, but what's happening with Admin. Am I missing something here? I've meet some realy nice editors and some bad ones, but in the end somebody (or somebodies) has to make the '''main''' call. Are there any similarities with your situation? [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 05:28, 24 October 2009 (PDT)