7,909
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchWiki Balkan Dramas
: Hi this is good - see if you can edit the talk pages of the parent article. If not, leave something in my talk directory and I will edit it in. Do you not belong to [http://wikipediareview.com/ Wikikpedia Review]? That is the place where all the dirt is dished, these days. There is a major scandal going on at the moment. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 11:56, 8 October 2009 (PDT)
: Hi this is good - see if you can edit the talk pages of the parent article. If not, leave something in my talk directory and I will edit it in. Do you not belong to [http://wikipediareview.com/ Wikikpedia Review]? That is the place where all the dirt is dished, these days. There is a major scandal going on at the moment. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 11:56, 8 October 2009 (PDT)
:: Hm mm, there seems to be a lot more of dirt being dished out than I realized. Thanks for that! [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:49, 9 October 2009 (PDT)
:: Hm mm, there seems to be a lot more of dirt being dished out than I realized. Thanks for that! [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:49, 9 October 2009 (PDT)
== Wiki Balkan Dramas [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Josip_Broz_Tito/Archive_2#War_crimes_Under_Tito_.28Commanded_all_partisans_and_Communists.29]==
Information on www.spiritus-temporis.com
War crimes Under Tito (Commanded all partisans and Communists)
''The Bleiburg massacre occurred near to the end of World War II, during May 1945. It is named after the village of Bleiburg on the Austrian-Slovenian border, near where the massacre began. It involved mass murder of Croatian soldiers and civilians who were fleeing from the defeated Independent State of Croatia, a puppet state of the Nazi regime in Germany. The atrocities were a reprisal against the real or alleged members or collaborators of the fascist regime, by the communist Yugoslav partisan army, presumably with the full knowledge of their supreme commander Josip Broz Tito, who was himself half-Croatian.''
''Although a still undefined number of Croatian soldiers died during a series of battles and skirmishes, it is generally accepted that the vast portion of violent deaths were the result of executions that lasted at least two weeks after the cessation of hostilities. The victims were Croatian soldiers and '''civilians''', executed '''without trial''' as an act of vengeance for the crimes committed by the Ustasi regime in Croatian-controlled territories during World War II — frequently in overtly gruesome manner ('''mass rape''' and subsequent '''killing by stoning of women'''; beheading of Croatian disarmed soldiers). Murder continued in nearby Slovenia, and it is hard to estimate the number of victims in Bleiburg field, compared to those later found in the trenches in the Maribor area and other numerous pits in Slovenia. Many captives were sent on a death march further into Yugoslav territory.''
''Croatian political emigration, as well as other sources related to the Cossacks, had published numerous testimonies on the atrocities and British involvement in the affair (interestingly enough, British archives on the Operation Keelhaul tragedy are still sealed), but their publications have received little attention since communist Yugoslavia was the West's protege and the buffer-zone to the Soviets in the post-war period.''
Now how can the leadership of the partisans not be responsible for these events? May be they just had a bad day at one of there Communists Party meetings. Sir Floyd (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah, poor Nazis and fascists. After they've brutally murdered 2 million Yugoslavs in 4 years the partisan's should've simply pardoned them for misbehaving. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
::The key word in your post being "presumably". :) Find yourself another one of your crappy "forums" to talk about your presumptions. Just forget about this, Luigi/Brunodam, you're not annoying anyone - you're just turning out amusing. I think I'll file a checkuser in an hour or so, you'd better believe it when I say I'll delete everything you wrote if you're a sock. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 15:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
::::Whitewashing? As I understand it, Tito was a fairly controversial leader, whose political legacy is still under debate by scholars. What I don't understand is why this article is devoid of any discussion of this scholarly contention. It seems this article is more focused towards listing Tito's awards than presenting any meaningful scholarly analysis of the man. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
'''Note''': Ivan Štambuk statement is very interesting. It might be there just for the benefit of other Editors, who might know nothing about historical events of WW2. This happens a lot with the Balkan Editors (something to think about). [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 00:41, 10 October 2009 (PDT)
