MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 02, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
12 bytes removed
, 19:48, 24 August 2009
| Line 60: |
Line 60: |
| | {| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%" |
| | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> | | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> |
| − | | The function <math>\texttt{(x, y)}</math> is the same as that associated with the operation <math>x + y\!</math> and the relation <math>x \ne y.</math></p> | + | | The function <math>\texttt{(x, y)}</math> is the same as that associated with the operation <math>x + y\!</math> and the relation <math>x \ne y.</math> |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> | | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> |
| Line 66: |
Line 66: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> | | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> |
| − | | More generally, the function <math>\nu_k (x_1, \dots, x_k)</math> for <math>k > 2\!</math> is not identical to the boolean sum <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j.</math></p> | + | | More generally, the function <math>\nu_k (x_1, \dots, x_k)</math> for <math>k > 2\!</math> is not identical to the boolean sum <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j.</math> |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> | | | valign="top" | <big>•</big> |
| − | | The inclusive disjunctions indicated for the <math>\nu_k\!</math> of more than one argument may be replaced with exclusive disjunctions without affecting the meaning, since the terms disjoined are already disjoint.</p> | + | | The inclusive disjunctions indicated for the <math>\nu_k\!</math> of more than one argument may be replaced with exclusive disjunctions without affecting the meaning, since the terms disjoined are already disjoint. |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |