12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday February 16, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Jon Awbrey/Notes/Factorization And Reification (view source)
Revision as of 12:08, 26 June 2009
, 12:08, 26 June 2009→Factoring Sign Relations: png char
In general, but in this context especially, it is convenient to have a name for the converse of the denotation relation, or for any selection from it. I have been toying with the idea of calling this ''annotation'', or maybe ''ennotation''.
In general, but in this context especially, it is convenient to have a name for the converse of the denotation relation, or for any selection from it. I have been toying with the idea of calling this ''annotation'', or maybe ''ennotation''.
For example, the assignment of the general term <math>s</math> to each of the objects <math>o_1, o_2, o_3\!</math> is one such functional patch, piece, segment, or selection. So this patch can be pictured according to the pattern that was previously observed, and thus transformed by means of a canonical factorization.
For example, the assignment of the general term <math>s\!</math> to each of the objects <math>o_1, o_2, o_3\!</math> is one such functional patch, piece, segment, or selection. So this patch can be pictured according to the pattern that was previously observed, and thus transformed by means of a canonical factorization.
In our example of a sign relation, we had a functional subset of the following shape:
In our example of a sign relation, we had a functional subset of the following shape:
