MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
820 bytes removed
, 20:49, 24 June 2009
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | | |
| | <pre> | | <pre> |
| − | | Things are equivocally named, when they have the name only in common,
| |
| − | | the definition (or statement of essence) corresponding with the name
| |
| − | | being different. For instance, while a man and a portrait can properly
| |
| − | | both be called "animals" [Greek 'zõon' means 'living' or 'true to life'],
| |
| − | | these are equivocally named. For they have the name only in common,
| |
| − | | the definitions (or statements of essence) corresponding with the name
| |
| − | | being different. For if you are asked to define what the being an animal
| |
| − | | means in the case of the man and the portrait, you give in either case
| |
| − | | a definition appropriate to that case alone. ("Categories", p. 13).
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | Aristotle, "The Categories", in 'Aristotle, Volume 1',
| |
| − | | Translated by H.P. Cooke & H. Tredennick, Loeb Classics,
| |
| − | | William Heinemann Ltd, London, UK, 1938.
| |
| − |
| |
| | I would like to introduce a concept that I find to be of | | I would like to introduce a concept that I find to be of |
| | use in discussing the problems of hypostatic abstraction, | | use in discussing the problems of hypostatic abstraction, |
