MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
70 bytes added
, 18:45, 19 June 2009
Line 42: |
Line 42: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | The formula shown in the Figure arises by substituting <math>p + \operatorname{d}p</math> for <math>p\!</math> and <math>q + \operatorname{d}q</math> for <math>q\!</math> in the boolean product or logical conjunction <math>pq\!</math> and writing the result as a cactus graph. This follows from the fact that the boolean sum <math>p + \operatorname{d}p</math> is equivalent to the logical operation of exclusive disjunction, which parses to a cactus graph of the following form: | + | The cactus formula <math>\texttt{(p, dp)(q, dq)}</math> and its corresponding graph arise by substituting <math>p + \operatorname{d}p</math> for <math>p\!</math> and <math>q + \operatorname{d}q</math> for <math>q\!</math> in the boolean product or logical conjunction <math>pq\!</math> and writing the result in the two dialects of cactus syntax. This follows from the fact that the boolean sum <math>p + \operatorname{d}p</math> is equivalent to the logical operation of exclusive disjunction, which parses to a cactus graph of the following form: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="10" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="10" |
Line 49: |
Line 49: |
| | | |
| Next question: What is the difference between the value of the | | Next question: What is the difference between the value of the |
− | proposition <math>pq\!</math> over there, at a distance of <math>\operatorname{d}p</math> and <math>\operatorname{d}q,</math> and the value of the proposition <math>pq\!</math> where you are satnding, all expressed in the form of a general formula, of course? Here is the appropriate formulation: | + | proposition <math>pq\!</math> over there, at a distance of <math>\operatorname{d}p</math> and <math>\operatorname{d}q,</math> and the value of the proposition <math>pq\!</math> where you are standing, all expressed in the form of a general formula, of course? Here is the appropriate formulation: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |