MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 05, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
209 bytes added
, 23:08, 14 June 2009
Line 3,129: |
Line 3,129: |
| Up to this point, we are still reading the elementary relatives of the form <math>i\!:\!j</math> in the way that Peirce read them in logical contexts: <math>i\!</math> is the relate, <math>j\!</math> is the correlate, and in our current example <math>i\!:\!j,</math> or more exactly, <math>m_{ij} = 1,\!</math> is taken to say that <math>i\!</math> is a marker for <math>j.\!</math> This is the mode of reading that we call "multiplying on the left". | | Up to this point, we are still reading the elementary relatives of the form <math>i\!:\!j</math> in the way that Peirce read them in logical contexts: <math>i\!</math> is the relate, <math>j\!</math> is the correlate, and in our current example <math>i\!:\!j,</math> or more exactly, <math>m_{ij} = 1,\!</math> is taken to say that <math>i\!</math> is a marker for <math>j.\!</math> This is the mode of reading that we call "multiplying on the left". |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | In the algebraic, permutational, or transformational contexts of application, however, Peirce converts to the alternative mode of reading, although still calling <math>i\!</math> the relate and <math>j\!</math> the correlate, the elementary relative <math>i\!:\!j</math> now means that <math>i\!</math> gets changed into <math>j.\!</math> In this scheme of reading, the transformation <math>a\!:\!b + b\!:\!c + c\!:\!a</math> is a permutation of the aggregate <math>\mathbf{1} = a + b + c,</math> or what we would now call the set <math>\{ a, b, c \},\!</math> in particular, it is the permutation that is otherwise notated as follows: |
− | In the algebraic, permutational, or transformational contexts of | |
− | application, however, Peirce converts to the alternative mode of | |
− | reading, although still calling i the relate and j the correlate, | |
− | the elementary relative i:j now means that i gets changed into j. | |
− | In this scheme of reading, the transformation a:b + b:c + c:a is | |
− | a permutation of the aggregate $1$ = a + b + c, or what we would | |
− | now call the set {a, b, c}, in particular, it is the permutation | |
− | that is otherwise notated as: | |
| | | |
− | ( a b c )
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" |
− | < >
| + | | |
− | ( b c a )
| + | <math>\begin{Bmatrix} |
| + | a & b & c |
| + | \\ |
| + | b & c & a |
| + | \end{Bmatrix}</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | This is consistent with the convention that Peirce uses in | + | This is consistent with the convention that Peirce uses in the paper "On a Class of Multiple Algebras" (CP 3.324–327). |
− | the paper "On a Class of Multiple Algebras" (CP 3.324-327). | |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ==Note 16== | | ==Note 16== |