3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday September 03, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Sam Blacketer controversy (view source)
Revision as of 16:12, 14 June 2009
, 16:12, 14 June 2009this is a real stinker
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{AfDM|page=Sam Blacketer controversy|logdate=2009 June 8|substed=yes }}
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Sam Blacketer controversy|date=8 June 2009|result='''keep'''}} -->
{{Rescue}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
The '''Sam Blacketer controversy''' was a news story regarding the use of multiple [[User (computing)|user accounts]] on the [[English Wikipedia]] by David Boothroyd, a London lobbyist and local councillor.<ref name=NZH>{{cite news
|last= Welham
|first= Jamie
|coauthors= Nina Lakhani
|title= Wikipedia sentinel quits after 'sock-puppeting' scandal
|work= [[New Zealand Herald]]
|date= 2009-06-08
|url= http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10577178
|accessdate= 2009-06-08}}</ref><ref name=TR>{{cite news
|last= Metz
|first= Cade
|title= Sockpuppeting British politico resigns from Wikisupremecourt
|work= [[The Register]]
|date= 2009-05-26
|url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/26/wikipedia_westminster_councillor/
|accessdate = 2009-06-09}}</ref><ref> [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/wikipedia-sentinel-quits-after-using-alias-to-alter-entries-1698762.html Wikipedia 'sentinel' quits after using alias to alter entries, ''The Independent'']</ref><ref> [http://www.thecnj.co.uk/westend/2009/060509/wnews060509_02.html Camden New Journal article]</ref><ref>[http://www.corriere.it/cronache/09_giugno_07/wikipedia_alterazione_brown_cacciato_66c7895e-537f-11de-b645-00144f02aabc.shtml "Modifica la pagina di Cameron:
consigliere cacciato da Wikipedia" by Francesco Tortora, ''Corriere Della Sera'']</ref> Boothroyd stepped down from the website's Arbitration Committee, on which he had been serving under the alias "Sam Blacketer", in May 2009 after admitting to having used other undisclosed user accounts in the time period before he became an arbitrator.<ref name=NZH/> The practice of using multiple accounts can be acceptable in many cases. Boothroyd's use was seen as violating Wikipedia's policies which is held in tension with his involvement with the Arbitration Committee that, according to the site "the community of editors at large has elected to resolve the most complex or intractable disputes".<ref name="Arbitration Committee">{{cite web
| title=Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee
| publisher=[[Wikipedia]]
| date=June 2009
| url
=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_committee
| accessdate=2009-06-14}}</ref>
==Background==
"Sam Blacketer" is the name of a Wikipedia user account run by David Boothroyd, a [[City of Westminster|Westminster]] [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] councillor in [[London]], [[United Kingdom]].<ref name=NZH/> In December 2007, he was elected to the Arbitration Committee, a body within the online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] that settles editorial disputes.<ref name=NZH/>
Sometime in May 2009, it emerged that Boothroyd had operated multiple accounts before he became an arbitrator, and was found to have used them to grant extra support for a viewpoint in editorial disputes.<ref name=NZH/> That, along with what has been described as a major conflict of interest, led to him being forced to step down from the Committee.<ref name=NZH/> Consequently, several media outlets reported on the episode. In response to the controversy, Paul Williams, volunteers director at Wikimedia UK, said: "Sock-puppeting is a very serious offence for anybody. But for someone on the Arbitration Committee it is even more so. It can result in a lifetime ban. The problem with Wikipedia is that you can hide behind user names, but there is an expectation that you don't write for self-interest. In this case there is a conflict of interest."<ref name=NZH/> Boothroyd has defended himself by saying that his use of multiple accounts was an "innocent oversight", and said he had created other identities after his political allegiance had been discovered and he was consequently accused of bias.<ref name=NZH/><ref name=DM/> Wikipedia's logs show that he had stopped using his alternative accounts "Fys" and "Dbiv" in 2007, before becoming an arbitrator but after he had been promoted to site administrator.<ref name=TR />
== Alleged inappropriate edits ==
[[File:DCameron320wi.jpg|thumb|The photo of [[David Cameron]] Boothroyd removed as having "saintly overtones."]]
[[File:Davidcameron.jpg||thumb|200px|The image Boothroyd inserted instead.<ref name=TR/>]]
Boothroyd was accused of making inappropriate edits include changing a picture of [[David Cameron]], leader of the Labour Party's rival, the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], on the relevant Wikipedia article to one "not carrying saintly overtones".<ref name=NZH/> The image Boothroyd deleted originated from a post on the [[Peter Hitchens]] blog on the website of ''[[The Daily Mail]]''.<ref>Peter Hitchens (2009-05-12). [http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/05/the-cameroon-diehards-answered-though-i-suspect-theyll-just-think-of-another-excuse-to-rally-round-b.html "The Cameroon diehards answered, though I suspect they'll just think of another excuse to rally round Blue Labour"], ''[[The Mail on Sunday]]''</ref>
''[[The Daily Mail]]'' reported that Boothroyd has "made regular alterations to the Tory leader's page", as well as trying to adjust the description of the Conservative Party's lead in opinion polls over the Labour Party, though the paper did say that the alterations "were not inaccurate or overtly critical".<ref name=DM>{{cite news
|last= Tozer
|first= James
|title= Labour councillor David Boothroyd caught altering David Cameron's Wikipedia entry
|work= [[The Daily Mail]]
|date= 2009-06-08
|url= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191474/Labour-councillor-David-Boothroyd-caught-altering-David-Camerons-Wikipedia-entry.html
|accessdate = 2009-06-08}}</ref> In the edit about the Tories' lead in the opinion polls, Boothroyd inserted information about the Tories having been "consistently ahead throughout 2008", wording which was not present before his edit. In the same edit, Boothroyd inserted a passage saying that "Cameron's appearance on the cover of ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' in September 2008 was said by the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to present him to the world as 'Prime Minister in waiting'." Boothroyd regularly expunged instances of vandalism to David Cameron's article, throughout his tenure as an arbitrator in 2008 and 2009.<ref name=TR/> The controversy has been described by the ''Daily Mail'' as an "embarrassment" for the governing Labour Party in the UK, and a "blow" for Wikipedia.<ref name=DM/>
==See also==
*[[Essjay controversy]]
==Footnotes==
{{reflist}}
{{Wikipedia}}
[[Category:History of Wikipedia]]
[[Category:2009 controversies]]
[[Category:Scandals]]
{{AfDM|page=Sam Blacketer controversy|logdate=2009 June 8|substed=yes }}
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Sam Blacketer controversy|date=8 June 2009|result='''keep'''}} -->
{{Rescue}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
The '''Sam Blacketer controversy''' was a news story regarding the use of multiple [[User (computing)|user accounts]] on the [[English Wikipedia]] by David Boothroyd, a London lobbyist and local councillor.<ref name=NZH>{{cite news
|last= Welham
|first= Jamie
|coauthors= Nina Lakhani
|title= Wikipedia sentinel quits after 'sock-puppeting' scandal
|work= [[New Zealand Herald]]
|date= 2009-06-08
|url= http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10577178
|accessdate= 2009-06-08}}</ref><ref name=TR>{{cite news
|last= Metz
|first= Cade
|title= Sockpuppeting British politico resigns from Wikisupremecourt
|work= [[The Register]]
|date= 2009-05-26
|url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/26/wikipedia_westminster_councillor/
|accessdate = 2009-06-09}}</ref><ref> [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/wikipedia-sentinel-quits-after-using-alias-to-alter-entries-1698762.html Wikipedia 'sentinel' quits after using alias to alter entries, ''The Independent'']</ref><ref> [http://www.thecnj.co.uk/westend/2009/060509/wnews060509_02.html Camden New Journal article]</ref><ref>[http://www.corriere.it/cronache/09_giugno_07/wikipedia_alterazione_brown_cacciato_66c7895e-537f-11de-b645-00144f02aabc.shtml "Modifica la pagina di Cameron:
consigliere cacciato da Wikipedia" by Francesco Tortora, ''Corriere Della Sera'']</ref> Boothroyd stepped down from the website's Arbitration Committee, on which he had been serving under the alias "Sam Blacketer", in May 2009 after admitting to having used other undisclosed user accounts in the time period before he became an arbitrator.<ref name=NZH/> The practice of using multiple accounts can be acceptable in many cases. Boothroyd's use was seen as violating Wikipedia's policies which is held in tension with his involvement with the Arbitration Committee that, according to the site "the community of editors at large has elected to resolve the most complex or intractable disputes".<ref name="Arbitration Committee">{{cite web
| title=Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee
| publisher=[[Wikipedia]]
| date=June 2009
| url
=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_committee
| accessdate=2009-06-14}}</ref>
==Background==
"Sam Blacketer" is the name of a Wikipedia user account run by David Boothroyd, a [[City of Westminster|Westminster]] [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] councillor in [[London]], [[United Kingdom]].<ref name=NZH/> In December 2007, he was elected to the Arbitration Committee, a body within the online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] that settles editorial disputes.<ref name=NZH/>
Sometime in May 2009, it emerged that Boothroyd had operated multiple accounts before he became an arbitrator, and was found to have used them to grant extra support for a viewpoint in editorial disputes.<ref name=NZH/> That, along with what has been described as a major conflict of interest, led to him being forced to step down from the Committee.<ref name=NZH/> Consequently, several media outlets reported on the episode. In response to the controversy, Paul Williams, volunteers director at Wikimedia UK, said: "Sock-puppeting is a very serious offence for anybody. But for someone on the Arbitration Committee it is even more so. It can result in a lifetime ban. The problem with Wikipedia is that you can hide behind user names, but there is an expectation that you don't write for self-interest. In this case there is a conflict of interest."<ref name=NZH/> Boothroyd has defended himself by saying that his use of multiple accounts was an "innocent oversight", and said he had created other identities after his political allegiance had been discovered and he was consequently accused of bias.<ref name=NZH/><ref name=DM/> Wikipedia's logs show that he had stopped using his alternative accounts "Fys" and "Dbiv" in 2007, before becoming an arbitrator but after he had been promoted to site administrator.<ref name=TR />
== Alleged inappropriate edits ==
[[File:DCameron320wi.jpg|thumb|The photo of [[David Cameron]] Boothroyd removed as having "saintly overtones."]]
[[File:Davidcameron.jpg||thumb|200px|The image Boothroyd inserted instead.<ref name=TR/>]]
Boothroyd was accused of making inappropriate edits include changing a picture of [[David Cameron]], leader of the Labour Party's rival, the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], on the relevant Wikipedia article to one "not carrying saintly overtones".<ref name=NZH/> The image Boothroyd deleted originated from a post on the [[Peter Hitchens]] blog on the website of ''[[The Daily Mail]]''.<ref>Peter Hitchens (2009-05-12). [http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/05/the-cameroon-diehards-answered-though-i-suspect-theyll-just-think-of-another-excuse-to-rally-round-b.html "The Cameroon diehards answered, though I suspect they'll just think of another excuse to rally round Blue Labour"], ''[[The Mail on Sunday]]''</ref>
''[[The Daily Mail]]'' reported that Boothroyd has "made regular alterations to the Tory leader's page", as well as trying to adjust the description of the Conservative Party's lead in opinion polls over the Labour Party, though the paper did say that the alterations "were not inaccurate or overtly critical".<ref name=DM>{{cite news
|last= Tozer
|first= James
|title= Labour councillor David Boothroyd caught altering David Cameron's Wikipedia entry
|work= [[The Daily Mail]]
|date= 2009-06-08
|url= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191474/Labour-councillor-David-Boothroyd-caught-altering-David-Camerons-Wikipedia-entry.html
|accessdate = 2009-06-08}}</ref> In the edit about the Tories' lead in the opinion polls, Boothroyd inserted information about the Tories having been "consistently ahead throughout 2008", wording which was not present before his edit. In the same edit, Boothroyd inserted a passage saying that "Cameron's appearance on the cover of ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' in September 2008 was said by the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to present him to the world as 'Prime Minister in waiting'." Boothroyd regularly expunged instances of vandalism to David Cameron's article, throughout his tenure as an arbitrator in 2008 and 2009.<ref name=TR/> The controversy has been described by the ''Daily Mail'' as an "embarrassment" for the governing Labour Party in the UK, and a "blow" for Wikipedia.<ref name=DM/>
==See also==
*[[Essjay controversy]]
==Footnotes==
{{reflist}}
{{Wikipedia}}
[[Category:History of Wikipedia]]
[[Category:2009 controversies]]
[[Category:Scandals]]
