Line 5,937:
Line 5,937:
====Note 10====
====Note 10====
+
+
The genealogy of this conception of pragmatic representation is very intricate. I'll sketch a few details that I think I remember clearly enough, subject to later correction. Without checking historical accounts, I won't be able to pin down anything approaching a real chronology, but most of these notions were standard furnishings of the 19th Century mathematical study, and only the last few items date as late as the 1920's.
<pre>
<pre>
−
| Consider what effects that might conceivably have
−
| practical bearings you conceive the objects of your
−
| conception to have. Then, your conception of those
−
| effects is the whole of your conception of the object.
−
|
−
| Charles Sanders Peirce, "The Maxim of Pragmatism, CP 5.438.
−
−
The genealogy of this conception of pragmatic representation is very intricate.
−
I will delineate some details that I presently fancy I remember clearly enough,
−
subject to later correction. Without checking historical accounts, I will not
−
be able to pin down anything like a real chronology, but most of these notions
−
were standard furnishings of the 19th Century mathematical study, and only the
−
last few items date as late as the 1920's.
−
The idea about the regular representations of a group is universally known
The idea about the regular representations of a group is universally known
as "Cayley's Theorem", usually in the form: "Every group is isomorphic to
as "Cayley's Theorem", usually in the form: "Every group is isomorphic to