MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday April 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
680 bytes added
, 14:30, 28 May 2009
Line 3,394: |
Line 3,394: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
| + | We did not yet go through the trouble to interpret this (first order) ''difference of conjunction'' fully, but were happy simply to evaluate it with respect to a single location in the universe of discourse, namely, at the point picked out by the singular proposition <math>xy,\!</math> that is, at the place where <math>x = 1\!</math> and <math>y = 1.\!</math> This evaluation is written in the form <math>\operatorname{D}f|_{xy}</math> or <math>\operatorname{D}f|_{(1, 1)},</math> and we arrived at the locally applicable law that is stated and illustrated as follows: |
| + | |
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |
| + | | align="center" | |
| + | <math>f ~=~ xy ~=~ x ~\operatorname{and}~ y ~\Rightarrow~ \operatorname{D}f|_{xy} ~=~ \texttt{((} \operatorname{dx} \texttt{)(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{))} ~=~ \operatorname{d}x ~\operatorname{or}~ \operatorname{d}y.</math> |
| + | |- |
| + | | align="center" | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | We did not yet go through the trouble to interpret this (first order)
| |
− | "difference of conjunction" fully, but were happy simply to evaluate
| |
− | it with respect to a single location in the universe of discourse,
| |
− | namely, at the point picked out by the singular proposition xy,
| |
− | in as much as if to say, at the place where x = 1 and y = 1.
| |
− | This evaluation is written in the form Df|xy or Df|<1, 1>,
| |
− | and we arrived at the locally applicable law that states
| |
− | that f = xy = x & y => Df|xy = ((dx)(dy)) = dx or dy.
| |
− |
| |
| o---------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | |
Line 3,440: |
Line 3,438: |
| | Df|xy = ((dx)(dy)) | | | | Df|xy = ((dx)(dy)) | |
| o---------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------o |
| + | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | The picture illustrates the analysis of the inclusive disjunction ((dx)(dy)) | + | The picture shows the analysis of the inclusive disjunction <math>\texttt{((} \operatorname{d}x \texttt{)(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{))}</math> into the following exclusive disjunction: |
− | into the exclusive disjunction: dx(dy) + dy(dx) + dx dy, a proposition that | |
− | may be interpreted to say "change x or change y or both". And this can be
| |
− | recognized as just what you need to do if you happen to find yourself in
| |
− | the center cell and desire a detailed description of ways to depart it.
| |
| | | |
− | Jon Awbrey --
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |
| + | | align="center" | <math>\operatorname{d}x ~\texttt{(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{)} ~+~ \operatorname{d}y ~\texttt{(} \operatorname{d}x \texttt{)} ~+~ \operatorname{d}x ~\operatorname{d}y.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | Formerly Of:
| + | This resulting differential proposition may be interpreted to say "change <math>x\!</math> or change <math>y\!</math> or both". And this can be recognized as just what you need to do if you happen to find yourself in the center cell and desire a detailed description of ways to depart it. |
− | Center Cell,
| |
− | Chateau Dif.
| |
− | </pre> | |
| | | |
| ====Note 3==== | | ====Note 3==== |