Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday April 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
→‎Note 2: markup
Line 3,394: Line 3,394:  
|}
 
|}
    +
We did not yet go through the trouble to interpret this (first order) ''difference of conjunction'' fully, but were happy simply to evaluate it with respect to a single location in the universe of discourse, namely, at the point picked out by the singular proposition <math>xy,\!</math> that is, at the place where <math>x = 1\!</math> and <math>y = 1.\!</math>  This evaluation is written in the form <math>\operatorname{D}f|_{xy}</math> or <math>\operatorname{D}f|_{(1, 1)},</math> and we arrived at the locally applicable law that is stated and illustrated as follows:
 +
 +
{| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%"
 +
| align="center" |
 +
<math>f ~=~ xy ~=~ x ~\operatorname{and}~ y ~\Rightarrow~ \operatorname{D}f|_{xy} ~=~ \texttt{((} \operatorname{dx} \texttt{)(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{))} ~=~ \operatorname{d}x ~\operatorname{or}~ \operatorname{d}y.</math>
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" |
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
We did not yet go through the trouble to interpret this (first order)
  −
"difference of conjunction" fully, but were happy simply to evaluate
  −
it with respect to a single location in the universe of discourse,
  −
namely, at the point picked out by the singular proposition xy,
  −
in as much as if to say, at the place where x = 1 and y = 1.
  −
This evaluation is written in the form Df|xy or Df|<1, 1>,
  −
and we arrived at the locally applicable law that states
  −
that f = xy = x & y  =>  Df|xy = ((dx)(dy)) = dx or dy.
  −
   
o---------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------o
 
|                                      |
 
|                                      |
Line 3,440: Line 3,438:  
| Df|xy =      ((dx)(dy))              |
 
| Df|xy =      ((dx)(dy))              |
 
o---------------------------------------o
 
o---------------------------------------o
 +
</pre>
 +
|}
   −
The picture illustrates the analysis of the inclusive disjunction ((dx)(dy))
+
The picture shows the analysis of the inclusive disjunction <math>\texttt{((} \operatorname{d}x \texttt{)(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{))}</math> into the following exclusive disjunction:
into the exclusive disjunction: dx(dy) + dy(dx) + dx dy, a proposition that
  −
may be interpreted to say "change x or change y or both".  And this can be
  −
recognized as just what you need to do if you happen to find yourself in
  −
the center cell and desire a detailed description of ways to depart it.
     −
Jon Awbrey --
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%"
 +
| align="center" | <math>\operatorname{d}x ~\texttt{(} \operatorname{d}y \texttt{)} ~+~ \operatorname{d}y ~\texttt{(} \operatorname{d}x \texttt{)} ~+~ \operatorname{d}x ~\operatorname{d}y.</math>
 +
|}
   −
Formerly Of:
+
This resulting differential proposition may be interpreted to say "change <math>x\!</math> or change <math>y\!</math> or both".  And this can be recognized as just what you need to do if you happen to find yourself in the center cell and desire a detailed description of ways to depart it.
Center Cell,
  −
Chateau Dif.
  −
</pre>
      
====Note 3====
 
====Note 3====
12,080

edits

Navigation menu