MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
327 bytes added
, 17:54, 4 May 2009
Line 5,626: |
Line 5,626: |
| ===Commentary Note 12.3=== | | ===Commentary Note 12.3=== |
| | | |
− | Peirce next considers a pair of compound logical involutions, stating an equation between them that amounts to a form of associative law: | + | Peirce next considers a pair of compound involutions, stating an equation between them that is roughly analogous to an associative law: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> | | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> |
Line 5,650: |
Line 5,650: |
| | | | | |
| <p>(Peirce, CP 3.77).</p> | | <p>(Peirce, CP 3.77).</p> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | Converting the relative term <math>\mathit{s}^{(\mathit{l}\mathrm{w})}\!</math> into its set-theoretic equivalent is fairly immediate: |
| + | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\mathit{s}^{(\mathit{l}\mathrm{w})} ~=~ \bigcap_{x \in LW} \operatorname{proj}_1 (S \star x) ~=~ \bigcap_{x \in LW} (S \cdot x)</math> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |