MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
341 bytes added
, 21:12, 30 April 2009
Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| o o o o o o o o o o X | | o o o o o o o o o o X |
− | / \ | + | / \ : | : | |
− | / \ L | + | / \ 0 1 0 1 L |
− | / \ | + | / \ : | : | |
− | o o o o o o o o o o X | + | o o o o + - + + o o X |
− | \ | / | + | \ | / : : | | |
− | \ | / S | + | \ | / 0 0 1 1 S |
− | \|/ | + | \|/ : : | | |
| o o o o o o o o o o X | | o o o o o o o o o o X |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Line 87: |
Line 87: |
| | | |
| It looks like we have a "servant of every lover of" link between <math>i\!</math> and <math>j\!</math> if and only if <math>i \cdot S \supseteq L \cdot j.</math> It looks like the vacuous inclusions will make this rather non-intuitive. | | It looks like we have a "servant of every lover of" link between <math>i\!</math> and <math>j\!</math> if and only if <math>i \cdot S \supseteq L \cdot j.</math> It looks like the vacuous inclusions will make this rather non-intuitive. |
| + | |
| + | Recall the analogy between involution and implication: |
| + | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | |
| + | <math> |
| + | \begin{bmatrix} |
| + | 0^0 & = & 1 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 0^1 & = & 0 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 1^0 & = & 1 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 1^1 & = & 1 |
| + | \end{bmatrix} |
| + | \begin{bmatrix} |
| + | 0 \Leftarrow 0 & = & 1 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 0 \Leftarrow 1 & = & 0 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 1 \Leftarrow 0 & = & 1 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 1 \Leftarrow 1 & = & 1 |
| + | \end{bmatrix} |
| + | </math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| ===Commentary on Selection 12=== | | ===Commentary on Selection 12=== |