MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday October 27, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
667 bytes added
, 18:16, 27 April 2009
| Line 5,372: |
Line 5,372: |
| | | | |
| | This says that a lover of every woman in the given universe of discourse is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math> In other words, a lover of every woman in this context is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math> | | This says that a lover of every woman in the given universe of discourse is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math> In other words, a lover of every woman in this context is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | Given a universe of discourse <math>X,\!</math> suppose that <math>L \subseteq X \times X\!</math> is the 2-adic relation associated with the relative term <math>\mathit{l} = \text{lover of}\,\underline{~~~~}.</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | Recall the definition of the local flags for such a relation: |
| | + | |
| | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| | + | | |
| | + | <math>\begin{array}{lll} |
| | + | L_{u \,\text{at}\, 1} & = & \{ (u, x) \in L \} |
| | + | \\[6pt] |
| | + | & = & \text{the set of ordered pairs in}~ L ~\text{with}~ u ~\text{in the 1st place}. |
| | + | \\[9pt] |
| | + | L_{v \,\text{at}\, 2} & = & \{ (x, v) \in L \} |
| | + | \\[6pt] |
| | + | & = & \text{the set of ordered pairs in}~ L ~\text{with}~ v ~\text{in the 2nd place}. |
| | + | \end{array}</math> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| | ===Commentary Note 12.2=== | | ===Commentary Note 12.2=== |