3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Logic Museum/Sophisma ‘omnis homo est’ (view source)
Revision as of 09:29, 25 April 2009
, 09:29, 25 April 2009→Question
|- valign = top
|- valign = top
|| [139]
|| [139]
Probatio et improbatio patent una cum solutione.
Probatio et improbatio patent una cum solutione. Circa istud sophisma primo quaeratur
* Utrum esse per se dictum possit praedicari de non ente actu, quia si sic tunc posset indifferenter verificari pro entibus et non entibus.
* Utrum esse per se dictum possit praedicari de non ente actu, quia si sic tunc posset indifferenter verificari pro entibus et non entibus.
* 2° utrum non ens possit dici individuum hominis, et hoc est quaerere utrum Caesare non existente Caesar sit homo.
* 2° utrum non ens possit dici individuum hominis, et hoc est quaerere utrum Caesare non existente Caesar sit homo.
* Ultimo quaeritur an non posita restrictione possit propositio habere veritatem.
* Ultimo quaeritur an non posita restrictione possit propositio habere veritatem.
||
||
Concerning this sophism it is asked
The proof and disproof are clearly at one with the solution. Concerning this sophism it is asked
* Whether 'being' predicated ''per se'' could be predicated of an actual non-being. For if so, then it could be verified indifferently for beings and non beings.
* Whether 'being' predicated ''per se'' could be predicated of an actual non-being. For if so, then it could be verified indifferently for beings and non beings.
