MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 04, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
741 bytes added
, 12:06, 21 April 2009
Line 218: |
Line 218: |
| I had to roll you back, Jon. Sorry. ;-) -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST) | | I had to roll you back, Jon. Sorry. ;-) -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST) |
| | | |
− | == Practical applications? == | + | ==Practical applications?== |
| | | |
| Hello, | | Hello, |
Line 225: |
Line 225: |
| | | |
| Presuming you realize my question is in good faith and also take the time to answer, thank you for expanding my knowledge base. | | Presuming you realize my question is in good faith and also take the time to answer, thank you for expanding my knowledge base. |
| + | |
| + | JA: This paper of Peirce's has always interested me because it's the one of the places where the logic of relations, and mathematical logic in general, really begins to take off. The lion's share of the logical concepts and notations that we actually use today go back to this and other works of Peirce. As far as nuts-&-bolts applications go, the founding ideas of relational database systems trace through Ted Codd directing back to Peirce's work on the logic of relative terms. |
| + | |
| + | JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have yet been applied to the extent that they might be. [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT) |