MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
137 bytes added
, 18:50, 20 April 2009
Line 5,282: |
Line 5,282: |
| In this setting, we would have: | | In this setting, we would have: |
| | | |
− | : 'l'<sup>w</sup> = 'l'<sup>(W<sub>1</sub> +, W<sub>2</sub> +, W<sub>3</sub>)</sup> = 'l'W<sub>1</sub> , 'l'W<sub>2</sub> , 'l'W<sub>3</sub>.
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w} ~=~ \mathit{l}^{(\mathrm{W}_1 ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{W}_2 ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{W}_3)} ~=~ \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_1}, \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_2}, \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_3}.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse would be a lover of W<sub>1</sub> and a lover of W<sub>2</sub> and lover of W<sub>3</sub>. | + | That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse would be a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_1\!</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_2\!</math> and lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_3.\!</math>. |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |